Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Fifth Circuit’s Stay of OSHA’s Vax-or-Test ETS Remains in Place – For Now

By Parker E. Thoeni on November 13, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On November 12, 2021, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit extended the temporary stay it had previously placed on the OSHA vax-or-test Emergency Temporary Standard, pending further judicial review of a request (one of many) to permanently enjoin OSHA from enforcing the ETS.  Describing the ETS as a scheme under which employers would be “deputized to participate in OSHA’s regulatory scheme…by forcing unwilling employees to take their shots, take their tests, or hit the road[,]” the Court described a litany of statutory defects with the ETS and questioned its constitutionality.

While the details of the opinion make for interesting reading and provide a potential roadmap for a permanent injunction of the ETS, the question for employers remains the same: Should we still prepare for the ETS to be implemented?  The answer to that question is the same as it was yesterday (and as we further explained in our November 9, 2021 blog post): likely so.  Although the ETS is temporarily stayed, the temporary stay is precarious.

Next week, on or before November 16, 2021, the various petitions challenging the ETS, filed across the country, will be consolidated into a single matter before a single federal Circuit Court of Appeals.  The challenges currently filed in 11 of the 12 Circuit Courts range from friendly challenges by unions in circuits they deem likely to uphold the ETS to challenges by businesses, States, religious groups, and individuals in circuits they believe likely to strike down the ETS.  The circuit that will ultimately decide the consolidated case will be chosen by a lottery pick as part of the multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) process.  The circuit selected in the lottery process will likely make the decision as to whether permanent injunctive relief is appropriate.  Following a decision from a Circuit Court of Appeals, we anticipate a request for review by the Supreme Court.  Frustratingly, it is not possible to predict the fate of the ETS at this point.

In other words, employers, stay tuned.

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Report
  • Organization:
    Shawe Rosenthal
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo