Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FTC To Focus on Subscription Services — Hints at Taking Action Against “Dark Patterns”

By Joseph J. Lewczak of Davis+Gilbert LLP, Paavana L. Kumar of Davis+Gilbert LLP & Alexa Meera Singh of Davis+Gilbert LLP on November 17, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The FTC has issued a new Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Negative Option Marketing (Policy Statement), generally warning companies about their compliance obligations relating to negative option programs and against using website design features to deceive consumers into signing up for subscription services (i.e. by using “dark patterns”).

The Policy Statement was released in light of an uptick in the number of consumer complaints citing harm caused by deceptive recurring subscription practices, such as billing consumers for unauthorized charges or making it difficult for consumers to cancel a subscription.

Subscription Programs Grow in Popularity

Negative-option programs include automatic renewals, continuity plans, free-to-pay or fee-to-pay conversions, and prenotification plans. These subscription-type programs have become increasingly popular in recent years, especially as retailers and other service providers have recognized that significant revenues can be earned from them. Subscription-based programs exist for everything from home fitness to dog food, and they are widely recognized as being the future of retail.

Negative Option Programs

While the structure of these arrangements varies, a hallmark feature of negative option programs is the ability for a seller to interpret a consumer’s silence (or failure to take an affirmative action to reject or to cancel) as an acceptance or continuing acceptance of the negative option offer. Examples of potentially unfair or deceptive negative option practices noted by the FTC include:

  • Inadequate disclosures of hidden charges in ostensibly “free” offers and other products or services;
  • Enrollment without appropriate consent; and
  • Inadequate or overly burdensome cancellation and refund procedures.

Three FTC Requirements To Know

As such, the Policy Statement includes FTC guidance regarding three key requirements to help sellers avoid an enforcement action:

  1. All material terms of a product or service must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed (i.e., practically unavoidable by ordinary consumers). Material terms include:
  • How much the product or service costs;
  • Deadlines by which the consumer must act to stop further charges;
  • The amount and frequency of such charges;
  • How to cancel; and
  • Information about the product or service itself that is needed to stop consumers from being deceived about the characteristics of the product or service.
  1. Sellers must obtain the consumer’s express informed consent before charging them for a product or service. Importantly, in a notable departure from current industry practice, the FTC’s position is that such consent must be obtained separately from any portion of the entire transaction. Note that disclosures should not include information that interferes with, detracts from, contradicts, or otherwise undermines the consumer’s ability to provide their express informed consent.
  2. Sellers must provide easy and simple cancellation methods to the consumer. These must be at least as easy to use as the method the consumer used to buy the product or service initially.

While this statement is non-binding guidance, it generally tracks the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (which applies to negative option programs) and is indicative of the FTC’s interpretation of existing law as it applies to negative option practices. Moreover, the FTC is currently conducting rulemaking on negative option marketing and operating, and has noted that it will continue closely monitoring compliance with applicable rules and laws.

THE BOTTOM LINE

  • Negative-option sellers should review their practices (including website flows, consent disclosures, and cancellation methods) to ensure compliance with this updated guidance.
  • Most importantly, companies should determine whether the consumer consent being obtained is consistent with the new policy statement.
  • The patchwork of applicable state laws continues to evolve — come July 2022, companies offering certain auto-renewing and continuous service subscriptions in California will be subject to enhanced notice and cancellation requirements.
  • Companies should think about any dark patterns they may be employing.

Connect with Joseph on LinkedIn.
Connect with Paavana on LinkedIn.
Connect with Alexa on LinkedIn.

Photo of Joseph J. Lewczak of Davis+Gilbert LLP Joseph J. Lewczak of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Joseph Lewczak is one of the most experienced advertising, marketing and promotions lawyers in the country. He helps clients ranging from creative, media and public relations agencies to retailers and video game companies assess legal risk and make informed decisions when launching high-impact…

Joseph Lewczak is one of the most experienced advertising, marketing and promotions lawyers in the country. He helps clients ranging from creative, media and public relations agencies to retailers and video game companies assess legal risk and make informed decisions when launching high-impact campaigns for innovative technologies, products and services.

Joseph’s clients need the right answers fast. Often acting as “legal quarterback” in major, multinational marketing and promotional campaigns, he coordinates between agency teams, in-house counsel and other stakeholders to ensure legal compliance across all aspects before launch, including a broad array of intellectual property, advertising, marketing and promotions issues. Whether he’s counseling the smallest agency start-up or the world’s largest communications industry holding company, clients appreciate his uncanny ability to cut through legalese and craft efficient, business-oriented solutions.

Taking a “never say can’t” approach, Joseph is there when his clients need a simple gut check for an idea or when they are developing complex plans for a product or service launch. He advises on strategies to increase brand impressions through a wide array of marketing and promotional tactics, including the use of endorsements and testimonials in social media and beyond, claim support and product demonstrations in more traditional advertising, and sweepstakes and contests and other promotional tools. Joseph bases his advice not only on his legal knowledge, but also on his keen awareness of enterprise risk tolerance.

Joseph has negotiated an endless number of complex talent, production, licensing, sponsorship and agency agreements, worth anywhere from thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. His clear, practical advice helps clients overcome differences to find common ground.

Before joining Davis+Gilbert, Joseph served as in-house counsel for EMI Music, gaining in-house knowledge that helps him anticipate and address client needs early in the creative process. His experience as an adjunct professor of advertising law at New York Law School and UCLA has deepened his interest in and respect for the history and legal bedrock of advertising law, while further sharpening his ability to spot potential issues and advise on novel legal scenarios.

Joseph is a professional songwriter and guitarist in an indie pop duo with his wife. His intimate knowledge of the music and creative industries gives him an added edge in understanding the pressures his clients face.

Read more about Joseph J. Lewczak of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailJoseph's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Paavana L. Kumar of Davis+Gilbert LLP Paavana L. Kumar of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Paavana Kumar helps major advertisers and retailers assess risk as they create compelling campaigns, run high-exposure promotions and streamline the online customer experience. She is a particular asset to clients seeking to leverage influencer talent, engage more creatively on social media, and reimagine…

Paavana Kumar helps major advertisers and retailers assess risk as they create compelling campaigns, run high-exposure promotions and streamline the online customer experience. She is a particular asset to clients seeking to leverage influencer talent, engage more creatively on social media, and reimagine their online e-commerce and subscription programs.

Paavana’s ability to assess problems and provide quick, efficient risk assessments enables her to partner effectively with companies across industries, especially those pursuing a deeper e-tail focus. She is a sounding board for C-suite executives and general counsel when making high-stakes judgment calls about social media opportunities, FTC disclosure requirements and major changes to their business models.

As many clients move toward subscription models, Paavana’s knowledge of the highly regulated automatic renewal and negative option laws across all 50 states enables her to help companies draft transparent marketing disclosures and design compliant user flows. She also advises on high-exposure consumer promotions, including sweepstakes, contests, loyalty rewards and gift cards, cause marketing and donation programs, text message and email marketing, and major entertainment and sports collaborations.

Whether she’s counseling on a discrete issue or working with global legal teams for clearance for an international campaign, Paavana delivers practical advice with enthusiasm and a sense of humor. She is a recognized thought leader who frequently speaks and writes about leading-edge e-commerce and influencer marketing topics for in-house counsel and industry stakeholders.

Paavana actively supports the firm’s recruiting efforts and enjoys mentoring summer associates.

Read more about Paavana L. Kumar of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailPaavana's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Alexa Meera Singh of Davis+Gilbert LLP Alexa Meera Singh of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Alexa Meera Singh takes a creative approach to counseling agencies, advertisers and global brands. She addresses complex legal issues that arise in advertising, marketing and media activities, and helps clients navigate regulatory requirements of the Food & Drug Administration, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer…

Alexa Meera Singh takes a creative approach to counseling agencies, advertisers and global brands. She addresses complex legal issues that arise in advertising, marketing and media activities, and helps clients navigate regulatory requirements of the Food & Drug Administration, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Product Safety Commission, and other state and federal agencies while adhering to industry-specific mandates.

With a keen understanding of a wide range of industries, including beauty, wellness, sustainability, fashion and textiles, food and beverage, and children’s products, Alexa provides cross-purpose, multidisciplinary legal counseling. A strong communicator, she translates complex legal principles into actionable guidance and balances legal compliance with business needs.

Alexa supports client solutions as early as the initial concept development stage by advising on claim substantiation and advertising copy, assisting with regulatory reviews and approvals, and developing compliance programs. In addition, she frequently advises on social media and influencer marketing campaigns as well as sweepstakes, contests and promotions. Alexa also helps draft and negotiate agreements concerning brand campaign activations and supports the development and licensing of consumer products and intellectual property.

Before she joined Davis+Gilbert, Alexa was an associate at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and Proskauer Rose, where she gained experience handling transactional and regulatory matters in advertising, entertainment and media as well as in consumer protection litigation.

Read more about Alexa Meera Singh of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailAlexa's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo