On the heels of a related action filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on November 12, 2021, Eckfeldt v. Barber was filed in the Superior Court of California, Orange County, on December 9, 2021, claiming breach of contract, fraud, intentional misrepresentation, and conversion.

In the SEC action, the SEC alleged that individual Defendants Brett Reed Barber (“Barber”) and Louis Alfonso Zimmerle (“Zimmerle”) used Defendant BNZ One Capital, LLC (“BNZ”) to solicit investments from potential investors by misrepresenting that BNZ was in the real estate investment business and promising returns of 8-10% annualized interest.  Nearly half of the investors used funds from their Individual Retirement Accounts.  Ultimately, this operated as a classic Ponzi scheme, with the schemers paying themselves handsome fees and paying earlier investors with later investors’ principal.

Plaintiff in the civil action is an investor who claims to have invested over $500,000 with Defendants through various Lender/Investment Statement Agreements.  Plaintiff ostensibly learned that he had invested in a Ponzi scheme when Barber was charged with federal fraud and money laundering crimes.  The complaint states that suspicions arose when Plaintiff requested tax documents to report his investments and Defendants refused to proffer the same.  After the SEC filed its parallel action, Plaintiff promptly filed this action to recover his losses from the schemers.

Photo of Katelyn M. Fox Katelyn M. Fox

Kate is a seasoned associate in the financial services litigation space, practicing in both state and federal courts nationwide. While Kate has experience with a variety of litigation matters, her practice is primarily focused on representing financial institutions in putative class actions involving…

Kate is a seasoned associate in the financial services litigation space, practicing in both state and federal courts nationwide. While Kate has experience with a variety of litigation matters, her practice is primarily focused on representing financial institutions in putative class actions involving consumer lending practices and Ponzi schemes. Additionally, Kate has managed and assisted with a range of complex commercial disputes, trust management and disputes arising from trust investment processes, class action settlements, and other financial fraud cases. Kate also has a strong commitment to pro bono practice and has assisted victims of domestic abuse, incarcerated individuals, and asylum seekers to overcome legal barriers to relief.