Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Delaware Court of Chancery Finds Lock-Up Inapplicable in de-SPAC Transaction

By Paul J. Shim, Calvin Ketchum, Timothy Saviola & Paul A. Brudnick on January 20, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a recent opinion addressing the enforcement of trading restrictions (“lock-ups”) that are commonly agreed in connection with a business combination transaction between a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) and a target company (“de-SPAC transaction”), the Delaware Court of Chancery determined that the restrictions at issue did not apply to certain shares held by the target company’s former Chief Executive Officer because he did not actually hold SPAC shares immediately after the consummation of the transaction.  The decision illustrates that common formulations of lock-ups may give rise to unintended consequences which allow relevant major parties, insiders or management to trade during the intended lock-up period.  Given frequent share price volatility both pre- and post-combination, lock-ups are a critical element of de-SPAC transactions and the agreements creating them must be drafted carefully.

Please click here to read the full alert memorandum.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    Cleary M&A and Corporate Governance Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo