Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

White House Announces First Sanctions after Russia Enters Ukraine’s Donetsk and Luhansk Regions

By Nicholas Turner, Wendy Wysong, Meredith Rathbone, Jack Hayes, Ed Krauland, Alexandra Baj & Dave Stetson on February 22, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 21, 2022, the White House issued a new Executive Order (EO) imposing comprehensive sanctions on the disputed Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine following President Vladimir Putin’s announcement that Russia would recognize the independence of the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LNR) and place Russian military forces in those territories for purported peacekeeping operations.

The new EO prohibits:

  • new investment in the DNR or LNR by US persons, wherever located;
  • the importation into the United States, directly or indirectly, of any goods, services, or technology from the DNR or LNR;
  • the exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a US person, wherever located, of any goods, services, or technology to the DNR or the LNR; and
  • any approval, financing, facilitation, or guarantee by a US person, wherever located, of a transaction by a foreign person where the transaction by that foreign person would be prohibited if performed by a US person or within the United States.

The comprehensive sanctions of the new EO mirror those that have been in place since 2014 in relation to the disputed Crimea region of Ukraine pursuant to EO 13685 of December 19, 2014.

The EO also allows the US Treasury Department, in consultation with the US State Department, to designate other regions of Ukraine that would be subject to these comprehensive sanctions. The EO refers to these  areas, together with the DNR and the LNR,  as “Covered Regions.” Because these regions are not recognized as countries by the United Nations, but rather as territories or jurisdictions, screening systems will need to account for geographic indicators such as city names, addresses, or other location identifiers. (See this 2015 OFAC guidance on Crimea for more information.)

The Biden administration could use the EO to impose similar comprehensive sanctions on any other regions in Ukraine that come under Russian control in the future.

Following the White House’s announcement, the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a series of general licenses (GLs) authorizing US persons to engage in certain transactions in relation to the DNR and the LNR regions. The GLs include:

  • GL No. 17 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the wind down of transactions involving the DNR or the LNR, including divesting or transferring pre-existing investments to non-US persons, and winding down operations, contracts, or other agreements in effect before February 21, 2022 until 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time of March 23, 2022 (i.e., approximately 30 days);
  • GL No. 18 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions related to the exportation or reexportation of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components for medical devices, or software updates for medical devices to the DNR or the LNR, or to third countries for reexport to the DNR or the LNR, as well as transactions related to the prevention, diagnosis, or treatment of COVID-19;
  • GL No. 19 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions related to telecommunications and mail involving the DNR or the LNR;
  • GL No. 20 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions related to the official business of the following organizations by their employees, grantees, or contractors: (i) the United Nations (including UN Programs, Funds, and Other Entities and Bodies, as well as its Specialized Agencies and Related Organizations); (ii) the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA); (iii) the African Development Bank Group, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank Group (IDB Group), including any fund entity administered or established by any of the foregoing; (iv) the International Committee of the Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; and (v) the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe;
  • GL No. 21 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions related to noncommercial personal remittances to or from the DNR or the LNR. GL No. 21 does not cover charitable donations of funds to or for the benefit of an entity or funds transfers for use in supporting or operating a business, including a family-owned business; and
  • GL No. 22 – authorizing US persons to engage in transactions that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the exportation or reexportation, directly or indirectly, to the DNR or the LNR of services incident to the exchange of personal communications over the internet.

Additionally, the EO delegates authority to the US Department of Treasury, in consultation with the US Department of State, to block the property of any person determined to operate in the DNR or LNR, as well as making or contributing any goods, services, or technology to, or receiving any goods, services, or technology from, such persons. As a result, any US person would be prohibited from engaging in any transfer or transaction involving property or interests in property of such Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDNs). The GLs noted above would not apply to transactions involving such persons.  The EO provides authority to designate leaders, senior executives, and board members of entities that are determined to operate in the DNR or LNR, which could result in additional designations of Russian oligarchs.

Also, such SDNs who are noncitizens will be denied entry into the United States under immigrant visa categories. Although the EO did not identify any specific SDNs, media reports indicate that additional sanctions could be announced soon. The White House also made clear that these restrictive trade measures are separate from and would be in addition to the economic measures being taken in coordination with allies and partners in the context of Russian troops entering Ukraine.

Finally, the EO prohibits any person (not just US persons) from undertaking any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions, or forming any conspiracy to violate the prohibitions involving SDNs named under the EO.

For more information on potential US sanctions, see this Steptoe blog post. For more information on potential EU and UK sanctions, see our blog posts here and here.

Visit this link to sign up to receive a recording of Steptoe’s recent webinar “Possible Sanctions Against Russia: What You Need to Know.”

For more information on how these developments may impact your organization, contact a member of Steptoe’s Economic Sanctions team.

###

Photo of Meredith Rathbone Meredith Rathbone

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms…

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Department of State. She regularly assists companies in developing compliance policies, conducting internal investigations, performing training, and conducting due diligence in M&A transactions. She has represented individuals and companies facing civil and criminal investigations in this area, and has also represented clients in their efforts to be removed from OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). She is a frequent writer and speaker on export controls and sanctions topics. She is the co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, and also serves on the Sanctions Subcommittee of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy.

Read Meredith’s full bio.

Read more about Meredith RathboneEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jack Hayes Jack Hayes

Jack Hayes has extensive experience providing clients with advice and assistance under ITAR and EAR, as well as US economic sanctions and anti-boycott regulations. Jack frequently handles complex export control matters, including voluntary disclosures, internal investigations of apparent export control violations, pre-closing and…

Jack Hayes has extensive experience providing clients with advice and assistance under ITAR and EAR, as well as US economic sanctions and anti-boycott regulations. Jack frequently handles complex export control matters, including voluntary disclosures, internal investigations of apparent export control violations, pre-closing and post-closing acquisition export compliance due diligence, export control audits, and assessments of compliance obligations and risks in accordance with relevant international trade regulations. He also provides guidance on brokering requirements and reporting obligations for certain fees, commissions, and political contributions related to sales of defense articles and defense services, prepares export and reexport license and agreement applications for submission, undertakes commodity jurisdiction and export classification analyses of items and services under the ITAR and EAR, drafts registration material change notifications, and develops compliance policies, programs, and training materials.

Read Jack’s full bio.

Read more about Jack HayesEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Ed Krauland Ed Krauland

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of…

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of government procurement regulations in the cross-border context. His practice spans all aspects of these laws, including counseling, compliance work, transactional advice, licensing and opinion work, internal reviews, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has served as co-chair of the International Trade Committee of the ABA Section of International Law and Practice. He is former Chairman of an ABA-wide Task Force on Gatekeeper Regulation (anti-money laundering compliance), and senior adviser to the ABA Section of International Law and Practice’s anti-money laundering committee.

Read Ed’s full bio.

Read more about Ed KraulandEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Alexandra Baj Alexandra Baj

Alex Baj’s practice primarily involves export controls and economic sanctions laws and regulations, anti-corruption investigations and compliance, international trade, and security clearance issues. Alex advises clients on export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International…

Alex Baj’s practice primarily involves export controls and economic sanctions laws and regulations, anti-corruption investigations and compliance, international trade, and security clearance issues. Alex advises clients on export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations, including the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and nuclear export controls under the jurisdiction of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).  Alex specializes in the development and implementation of export and anti-corruption compliance policies and procedures and training, internal investigations and voluntary disclosures under the EAR, the ITAR, and OFAC rules, due diligence for mergers and acquisitions, and on encryption and cybersecurity export controls.  Her clients include companies involved in defense, aerospace, software, semiconductor, and uranium processing industries.

Read Alex’s full bio.

Read more about Alexandra BajEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo