Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

ONC Information Blocking Data Show Majority of Claims Against Health Care Providers

By Conor Duffy on March 3, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 28, 2022, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) issued data on information blocking claims received since April 5, 2021, the effective date of information blocking regulations enacted under the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act). As a reminder, in accordance with the Cures Act’s prohibition on certain information blocking practices, in 2020 ONC issued a pair of rules (available here and here) to implement information blocking regulations (now found at 45 CFR Part 171).  Due to COVID-related delays, ONC ultimately set a compliance date for such regulations of April 5, 2021. ONC is now sharing preliminary data on the information blocking claims received for the first time.

ONC published data showing that 274 possible claims of information blocking have been received to date, with 176 claims submitted by a patient (directly or indirectly) and 42 by an attorney (the next largest category).  The highest number of claims submitted – 211 – identified a “health care provider” (which is defined broadly and can include without limitation a hospital, pharmacy, laboratory, or physician) as the actor allegedly responsible for information blocking,  followed by 42 claims against health information technology developers, with just two claims against health information exchanges.

The information blocking data are notable for the concentration of claims against health care providers, which could potentially influence enforcement priorities of the government. By law, the Office of Inspector General is authorized to investigate information blocking claims. The data might also serve as a resource for providers and compliance advisers to assess exposure to information blocking claims, review information access practices, and proactively implement compliant processes to maintain security as well as interoperability in accordance with the Cures Act, HIPAA, and the myriad additional federal and state privacy and security obligations of health care organizations.

This post is also being shared on our Health Law Diagnosis blog. If you’re interested in getting updates on developments affecting health information privacy and HIPAA related topics, we invite you to subscribe to the blog.

Photo of Conor Duffy Conor Duffy

Conor Duffy is a member of Robinson+Cole’s Health Law Group and the firm’s Data Privacy and Security Team. Conor advises hospitals, physician groups, community providers, and other health care entities on general corporate matters and health care issues. He provides legal counsel on…

Conor Duffy is a member of Robinson+Cole’s Health Law Group and the firm’s Data Privacy and Security Team. Conor advises hospitals, physician groups, community providers, and other health care entities on general corporate matters and health care issues. He provides legal counsel on a full range of transactional and regulatory health law issues, including contracting, licensure, mergers and acquisitions, Medicare and Medicaid fraud and abuse laws and regulations, HIPAA compliance, and other data privacy and security matters. Read his rc.com bio here.

Read more about Conor DuffyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo