Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Breaking News – China Finalizes Management Rules for E-Cigarettes

luke-besley-Lwyv5gZhMRw-unsplash
By David J. Ettinger, Eric Gu & Azim Chowdhury on March 17, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We reported in December 2021 that China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (STMA) published on its website the draft Management Rules for E-cigarettes and the updated national standard (GB) on e-cigarettes for public comment. Working with important industry members, including industry associations and manufacturers, Keller and Heckman filed comments to STMA to address and seek clarification on various issues that resulted from these publications.

On March 11, 2022, STMA announced the publication of the final Management Rules for E-cigarettes, which will take effect starting May 1, 2022. At the same time, the second draft GB standard on e-cigarettes also was published for comment by March 17. We summarize below some notable changes in the final Management Rules.

The final version deletes the definition for “e-cigarettes,” which was “an electronic delivery product that produces nicotine-containing aerosol for human inhalation.” Since the Management Rules state that e-cigarettes must comply with the mandatory national standard, one should now refer to the GB standard on e-cigarettes for the definition of e-cigarettes. Notably, the second draft GB standard removes “nicotine-containing” from the definition of e-cigarettes but at the same time adds a requirement that e-atomization materials must contain nicotine. Since the GB standard is still under development, we will continue to keep a close eye on how the potential change to the definition for e-cigarettes would impact the application scope of the Management Rules.

The final Management Rules remove product registration requirements. However, e-cigarette products, including imported products, still must pass the technical review by STMA before being marketed in China. It, therefore, appears that there has been a loosening of the regulatory requirements in this regard since a registration process is typically more onerous than a technical review. However, the details of what the technical review process will look like remain unclear. Accordingly, in line with our comments to STMA, e-cigarettes manufactured in China solely for export are not subject to product registration or technical review in China. Still, they must comply with the destination country’s laws (or China law, if the destination country has no relevant law).

Industry also expressed concerns about the prohibition in the draft Management Rules on flavored e-cigarettes. In the final version, the prohibition has been changed to “it is prohibited to sell flavored e-cigarettes other than tobacco flavors.” However, “tobacco flavors” is not clearly defined, while the draft GB standard still permits the use of various flavoring substances in e-cigarettes, like vanillin, lemon oil, etc.

Other than the above, many other requirements for e-cigarettes in China are still retained in the final Management Rules, including production licensing, purchase of leaf tobacco only from authorized companies, trading on a unified platform, etc. 

Since the Management Rules for E-cigarettes will take effect soon, industry should immediately understand all the specifics so that appropriate adjustments can be made in a timely manner. We are also preparing an English translation of the Management Rules, which will be made available upon request. In the meantime, if you need any assistance from us, please do not hesitate to contact David Ettinger (ettinger@khlaw.com), Azim Chowdhury (chowdhury@khlaw.com), Eric Gu (gue@khlaw.com), or your existing contact at Keller and Heckman LLP.

Photo of David J. Ettinger David J. Ettinger
Email
Photo of Eric Gu Eric Gu
Email
Photo of Azim Chowdhury Azim Chowdhury

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of…

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and international regulatory compliance. In particular, he has developed expertise in tobacco and vapor product regulation relating to the implementation of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and spearheaded the Tobacco and E-Vapor practice at Keller and Heckman. Specifically, Mr. Chowdhury has experience representing tobacco, e-cigarette and e-liquid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, suppliers and trade associations in matters of FDA, state and global regulatory compliance. He also assists corporations in establishing clearances for food and drug additives in the U.S., Canada, and European Union, with an emphasis on indirect additives used in food-contact materials.

Mr. Chowdhury has authored and edited numerous articles and publications, including Tobacco Regulation and Compliance: An Essential Resource, FDA Regulation of Tobacco: A Comprehensive Guide – An FDLI Primer and Tobacco and Nicotine Delivery: Regulation and Compliance, 2nd Edition. He is a frequent contributor to the Food and Drug Law Institute’s (FDLI) Update Magazine and has served on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Food and Drug Law Journal.  In addition, he has been interviewed in the U.S. News and World Reports Best Lawyers Edition (2016) and was named one of “10 Names to Know in the Vape World” in the October 2015 issue of Vape Magazine. Mr. Chowdhury received the 2018 National Law Review Go-To Thought Leadership Award for his consistent coverage of the emerging issues surrounding vaping and e-cigarettes on Keller and Heckman’s law blog, The Continuum of Risk.  As an industry leader, Mr. Chowdhury frequently speaks at industry conferences and events.

Mr. Chowdhury also has an active pro bono practice through Keller and Heckman’s Pro Bono Program, and has been featured in the Baltimore Sun for successfully obtaining asylum in the United States for a family who fled their home country of El Salvador because of violence they faced from an international gang.

Prior to entering private practice, he served as a judicial law clerk on the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Mr. Chowdhury received a B.A. and B.S. from Johns Hopkins University, a MBA from the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business, and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Maryland School of Law.

Education: Johns Hopkins University (B.A., B.S., 2003); University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business (M.B.A., 2006); University of Maryland School of Law (J.D., 2006, cum laude).

Admissions: District of Columbia; Maryland

Read more about Azim ChowdhuryEmailAzim's Linkedin ProfileAzim's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Featured Posts, Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    The Continuum of Risk
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • GovCon & Trade
  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo