Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Western Companies Starting to Feel Impact of Russian Sanctions

By Alex J. Brackett, Edwin O. Childs, Patrick Rowan, Elissa Baur & Jason H. Cowley on March 24, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

RELATED UPDATES:
FinCEN Alert Highlights Potential U.S. Commercial Real Estate Investments by Sanctioned Russian Elites and Their Proxies (January 30, 2023)
New Revelations in Ukraine Lead to Tightening Global Sanctions (April 8, 2022)

As we approach the thirty day mark since the United States, and other Western countries began imposing a series of rigorous sanctions on the Russian economy and key components thereof, we are starting to see real evidence of their broad impact.  Unfortunately, that includes significant impacts that Western companies are being forced to bear.  In some cases, large multinationals that could arguably continue to operate in Russia or with Russian partners are voluntarily electing to walk away from the country, whether due to the complication involved in navigating a dynamic sanctions environment, ambiguity around beneficial ownership of high risk partners, reputational concerns, a calculation that it was the right thing to do, or all of the above. However, other Western companies less well-situated to simply walk away from Russian business entanglements are finding themselves left with little choice but to absorb millions of dollars in losses.

For Western companies with Russian exposure, their ability to salvage their Russia-related operations and relationships is becoming increasingly challenging.  The sanctions impact is manifesting itself in various ways, including:

  • Lenders becoming increasingly hesitant to approve new loans or allow existing loans, credit facilities and other financing to proceed if there is exposure to Russia, even if the exposure does not run afoul of current sanctions. Borrowers are finding themselves forced to jettison or significantly constrain Russian subsidiaries and Russian business relationships in order to remain in good standing with their lenders.
  • Investors suffering steep losses in value on pre-sanctions holdings and, in some cases, being unable to exit positions with potential sanctions exposure.
  • Businesses that were ruble-exposed prior to imposition of sanctions (g., through forward currency contracts that are often used by western businesses to offset the risk of currency volatility when they have Russia-related operations) being exposed to massive devaluation of their positions.
  • Businesses that were reliant on outsourced Russian and Belarussian resources (g., in the software and other high-tech industries) facing skepticism from customers regarding the continued use of such offshoring, uncertainty under increasingly tight export control restrictions, cybersecurity concerns, and challenges making lawful payments.
  • Companies with Russian subsidiaries working in energy-related fields being subject to highly restrictive U.S. and EU sanctions against new energy sector investments that took immediate effect in the last two weeks and have functionally frozen many in their ability to support or maintain those businesses going forward and forced some to exit ventures immediately.

The extraordinary human suffering that is occurring in Ukraine certainly demonstrates that the U.S. and its Western partners were justified in imposing these sanctions as part of their efforts to deter Russia’s aggression. While it was always understood that non-Russian commercial parties would feel some of the sting of sanctions in order for them to be effective, it is not clear how much governments factored that impact into their decisions regarding the sanctions that have been rolled out.  It is also not clear how much further the impacts of the sanctions will extend into Western economies.

What is clear is that the expansive sanctions against Russia are not going away soon.  OFAC announced today the designation of dozens of Russian defense companies, 328 members of the Russian parliament’s lower chamber, and the CEO of Sberbank as “key enablers of the invasion” in coordination with similar designations by regulatory counterparts in the EU, UK and Canada. The U.S. and other Western countries will continue to identify additional targets for sanctions so long as the fighting continues.  Even if anticipated peace talks are successful, it is hard to imagine that NATO allies will be inclined to ratchet down the sanctions given the extraordinary damage to Ukraine and its citizens and the perceived threat to other countries,.  The sanctions are decidedly a long-term problem for Western companies involved in Russia and those businesses must plan accordingly.  Businesses with significant interests at risk should carefully assess the future impact of any responsive actions, particularly those that are made on grounds other than the direct application of mandatory legal requirements.

If you have further questions about the impact of these sanctions, or the breadth and capabilities of our practice, please contact the authors of this article

Photo of Alex J. Brackett Alex J. Brackett

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and…

Alex is a member of the Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, and co-head of McGuireWoods’ Strategic Risk and Compliance team. His practice focuses primarily on advising and supporting corporate and individual clients in the areas of white collar criminal defense and internal investigations.

Read more about Alex J. BrackettEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Edwin O. Childs Edwin O. Childs

As a leader of the firm’s Defense, National Security and Government Contracting industry team, Ned Childs is a government contract and investigations and enforcement attorney who represents companies across a wide range of sectors, including the defense, services, technology, and aerospace industries. His…

As a leader of the firm’s Defense, National Security and Government Contracting industry team, Ned Childs is a government contract and investigations and enforcement attorney who represents companies across a wide range of sectors, including the defense, services, technology, and aerospace industries. His practice, spanning more than a decade in Washington, encompasses a broad array of legal services, including government contract investigations, disclosures, and regulatory enforcement actions; bid protests and government contract disputes; government contract counseling; export licensing and enforcement; prime contractor-subcontractor disputes; corporate ownership and acquisition issues; and election law investigations and enforcement matters.

Read more about Edwin O. ChildsEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Patrick Rowan Patrick Rowan

As a member of the firm’s nationally recognized Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in international and national security matters. He has represented individuals and companies…

As a member of the firm’s nationally recognized Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department, Pat’s practice focuses on criminal and civil enforcement proceedings and internal investigations. He has substantial experience in international and national security matters. He has represented individuals and companies in a variety of federal criminal investigations, as well as civil enforcement actions. He also advises corporate clients on compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, OFAC sanctions, the ITAR, the EAR and CFIUS regulations. He has conducted numerous internal investigations for large companies with significant international operations.

Read more about Patrick RowanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Elissa Baur Elissa Baur

Elissa focuses her practice on white collar and antitrust criminal defense matters, including internal investigations, litigation, and regulatory enforcement actions. She has defended clients in numerous government investigations before the Department of Justice, United States Office of Special Counsel, Securities & Exchange Commission…

Elissa focuses her practice on white collar and antitrust criminal defense matters, including internal investigations, litigation, and regulatory enforcement actions. She has defended clients in numerous government investigations before the Department of Justice, United States Office of Special Counsel, Securities & Exchange Commission, Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), Office of the Comptroller of Currency, and Federal Reserve Board, among others.

Read more about Elissa BaurEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jason H. Cowley Jason H. Cowley

Jason Cowley, a former federal prosecutor, is the Chair of the firm’s Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department and a member of the Securities Enforcement and Litigation practice group. He principally represents financial institutions (including investment funds), corporations, and executives in criminal…

Jason Cowley, a former federal prosecutor, is the Chair of the firm’s Government Investigations and White Collar Litigation department and a member of the Securities Enforcement and Litigation practice group. He principally represents financial institutions (including investment funds), corporations, and executives in criminal investigations and trials, regulatory enforcement proceedings, and complex civil litigation. He also conducts internal investigations, undertakes transactional diligence, and advises on compliance matters. Jason has a particular expertise in matters involving securities and commodities fraud, cross-border enforcement issues, anti-money laundering issues, and criminal and civil asset forfeiture.

Read more about Jason H. CowleyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo