Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Vermont Continues Its Crackdown on Online ENDS Sellers

By Troutman Pepper Tobacco Practice, Bryan Haynes, Agustin Rodriguez, Chris Carlson & Nick Ramos on April 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last year we reported that Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan’s office settled with several online sellers over alleged violations of the state’s delivery sales ban of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) (the Delivery Sale Ban) and that we expected Vermont’s scrutiny to continue. As predicted, Attorney General Donovan’s office recently announced two more settlements with online sellers, resulting in a total of 23 settlements with online ENDS sellers for a total of $833,750 in civil penalties dating back to December 2020.

Vermont’s law, which became effective on July 1, 2019, bans the online sale and shipment of cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, little cigars, snuff, tobacco substitutes, substances containing nicotine or otherwise intended for use with a tobacco substitute, or tobacco paraphernalia. Tobacco substitute and/or substances containing nicotine include ENDS. The Delivery Sale Ban does not apply to premium cigars (defined as cigars weighing more than 4.5 pounds per 1,000).

A violation of the Delivery Sale Ban carries civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation and potential criminal penalties. Additionally, Delivery Sale Ban violations constitute a violation of the Vermont Consumer Protection Act for which the Vermont attorney general can seek an additional $10,000 per violation, in addition to other remedies.

In these two most recent cases, one New York-based seller shipped ENDS directly to Vermont consumers and admitted to the key facts. In addition to paying the civil penalties, the New York-based seller agreed to make changes to its website by providing disclosures to Vermont consumers and attempting to notify any Vermont consumers that try to purchase ENDS on its website that the company does not ship such products to Vermont consumers. The resolution requires the seller to provide its proposed disclosure to Vermont for approval.

The other company, a Nevada-based seller, relied on a drop-shipping model in which it transferred customer orders to another business that shipped the ENDS directly to Vermont consumers on its behalf. The company admitted to the key facts and agreed to pay the civil penalties and comply with the same conditions as the New York-based seller.

Given the recent history of enforcement action on this topic, online tobacco and ENDS retailers should beware of Vermont’s Delivery Sale Ban and similar laws in other jurisdictions.

Photo of Bryan Haynes Bryan Haynes

Bryan Haynes serves clients by developing and implementing creative solutions for complex issues. Specializing in tobacco industry regulatory compliance and enforcement matters, Bryan efficiently assists clients in complying with regulatory obligations and managing risk, consistent with clients’ business objectives.

Read more about Bryan HaynesEmail
Photo of Agustin Rodriguez Agustin Rodriguez

Agustin Rodriguez is a seasoned business counselor to regulated consumer products companies. Agustin brings years of experience managing in-house legal teams for a Fortune 200 international consumer packaged goods company, including complex litigation, tobacco and alcohol regulations and restrictions, international supply chain risk …

Agustin Rodriguez is a seasoned business counselor to regulated consumer products companies. Agustin brings years of experience managing in-house legal teams for a Fortune 200 international consumer packaged goods company, including complex litigation, tobacco and alcohol regulations and restrictions, international supply chain risk management, internal investigations and corporate compliance, transactions and governance.

Read more about Agustin RodriguezEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Chris Carlson Chris Carlson

Chris Carlson represents clients in regulatory, civil and criminal investigations and litigation. In his practice, Chris regularly employs his prior regulatory experience to benefit clients who are interacting with and being investigated by state attorneys general.

Read more about Chris CarlsonEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Nick Ramos Nick Ramos

Nicholas (Nick) Ramos draws on years of military leadership, project management, and legal experience to help clients solve difficult business problems from a legal perspective. He assists clients in navigating regulatory compliance issues, complex enforcement actions, and licensing that arise under both state…

Nicholas (Nick) Ramos draws on years of military leadership, project management, and legal experience to help clients solve difficult business problems from a legal perspective. He assists clients in navigating regulatory compliance issues, complex enforcement actions, and licensing that arise under both state and federal law.

Read more about Nick RamosEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Tobacco Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo