Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Vermont Continues Its Crackdown on Online ENDS Sellers

By Troutman Pepper Locke Tobacco Practice, Bryan Haynes, Agustin Rodriguez, Chris Carlson & Nick Ramos on April 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last year we reported that Vermont Attorney General T.J. Donovan’s office settled with several online sellers over alleged violations of the state’s delivery sales ban of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) (the Delivery Sale Ban) and that we expected Vermont’s scrutiny to continue. As predicted, Attorney General Donovan’s office recently announced two more settlements with online sellers, resulting in a total of 23 settlements with online ENDS sellers for a total of $833,750 in civil penalties dating back to December 2020.

Vermont’s law, which became effective on July 1, 2019, bans the online sale and shipment of cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, little cigars, snuff, tobacco substitutes, substances containing nicotine or otherwise intended for use with a tobacco substitute, or tobacco paraphernalia. Tobacco substitute and/or substances containing nicotine include ENDS. The Delivery Sale Ban does not apply to premium cigars (defined as cigars weighing more than 4.5 pounds per 1,000).

A violation of the Delivery Sale Ban carries civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation and potential criminal penalties. Additionally, Delivery Sale Ban violations constitute a violation of the Vermont Consumer Protection Act for which the Vermont attorney general can seek an additional $10,000 per violation, in addition to other remedies.

In these two most recent cases, one New York-based seller shipped ENDS directly to Vermont consumers and admitted to the key facts. In addition to paying the civil penalties, the New York-based seller agreed to make changes to its website by providing disclosures to Vermont consumers and attempting to notify any Vermont consumers that try to purchase ENDS on its website that the company does not ship such products to Vermont consumers. The resolution requires the seller to provide its proposed disclosure to Vermont for approval.

The other company, a Nevada-based seller, relied on a drop-shipping model in which it transferred customer orders to another business that shipped the ENDS directly to Vermont consumers on its behalf. The company admitted to the key facts and agreed to pay the civil penalties and comply with the same conditions as the New York-based seller.

Given the recent history of enforcement action on this topic, online tobacco and ENDS retailers should beware of Vermont’s Delivery Sale Ban and similar laws in other jurisdictions.

Photo of Bryan Haynes Bryan Haynes

Bryan serves clients by developing and implementing creative solutions for complex issues. Focusing in tobacco industry regulatory compliance and enforcement matters, Bryan efficiently assists clients in complying with regulatory obligations and managing risk, consistent with clients’ business objectives.

Read more about Bryan HaynesEmail
Photo of Agustin Rodriguez Agustin Rodriguez

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing…

Agustin is sought after by clients for his strategic counsel on their most challenging competitive and regulatory compliance issues, including tobacco Master Settlement Agreement issues, federal and state enforcement investigations, licensing and excise tax issues, developing compliance programs, and evaluating advertising and marketing practices. A partner in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group as well as its Tobacco and Cannabis law practices, he represents manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers in all aspects of their businesses, including regulatory compliance, FDA requirements, administrative disputes involving federal or state governmental entities, mergers and acquisitions, commercial agreements, and taxation matters.

Read more about Agustin RodriguezEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Chris Carlson Chris Carlson

Chris Carlson represents clients in regulatory, civil and criminal investigations and litigation. In his practice, Chris regularly employs his prior regulatory experience to benefit clients who are interacting with and being investigated by state attorneys general.

Read more about Chris CarlsonEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Nick Ramos Nick Ramos

Nick draws on years of military leadership, project management, and legal experience to help clients solve difficult business problems from a legal perspective. His practical advice enables clients to navigate regulatory compliance and licensing issues, complex investigations, and high stakes enforcement actions that

…

Nick draws on years of military leadership, project management, and legal experience to help clients solve difficult business problems from a legal perspective. His practical advice enables clients to navigate regulatory compliance and licensing issues, complex investigations, and high stakes enforcement actions that arise under state and federal law.

Read more about Nick RamosEmailNick's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Tobacco Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo