Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

COVID-19 Update: Federal Mask Mandate Struck Down by Florida Court

By Yvonne Puig (US), Daphne Calderon (US) & Hannah Putnam (US) on April 20, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 19, 2022, a federal district court in Florida determined the federal mask mandate from the Biden Administration was unlawful and therefore void. The mandate required patrons to wear a mask on public transportation, like airplanes, trains, and buses. The federal judge presiding over the case determined the mandate exceeded statutory authority created under the Health Services Act of 1944. The opinion explained that the CDC had authority to take measures it deemed necessary to prevent the interstate spread of communicable diseases, but nothing authorized it to require people to wear or companies to enforce a mask mandate.

The court explained, “If Congress intended [to allow the imposition of a mask mandate under the statute], the power bestowed on the C.D.C. would be breathtaking.” Instead, the court determined that individual airlines and other transit entities ought to be left with the decision on whether to require passengers to wear a mask. Since this decision, many large airlines publicized that they would no longer be requiring mask usage during transit. Those airlines include American, United, Southwest, Delta, jetBlue, Alaska, Spirit, and Frontier. Additionally, Amtrak announced it would no longer require passengers or employees to wear a mask on the trains or at the stations, although “[a]nyone needing or choosing to wear one is encouraged to do so.”

At this time, no appeal has been filed; however, Norton Rose Fulbright lawyers will continue to provide relevant updates for healthcare providers on the Health Law Pulse during the COVID-19 public health crisis.

Photo of Yvonne Puig (US) Yvonne Puig (US)

US Head of Life Sciences and Healthcare Yvonne Puig has a substantial commercial litigation practice in both state and federal courts. She represents hospitals, HMOs, managed care organizations, medical schools and other institutional health care providers and educational services companies. A partner in…

US Head of Life Sciences and Healthcare Yvonne Puig has a substantial commercial litigation practice in both state and federal courts. She represents hospitals, HMOs, managed care organizations, medical schools and other institutional health care providers and educational services companies. A partner in Norton Rose Fulbright’s Austin office, Yvonne’s practice involves commercial and health care litigation, antitrust, regulatory and compliance advice, crisis management, staff privileges, exclusive contracting and administrative law.

Read more about Yvonne Puig (US)Email
Show more Show less
Photo of Daphne Calderon (US) Daphne Calderon (US)
Read more about Daphne Calderon (US)Email
Photo of Hannah Putnam (US) Hannah Putnam (US)
Read more about Hannah Putnam (US)Email
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Health Law Pulse
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo