Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Reviewing the Reversal Rates by Civil Area of Law for the Second District, 2010-2019

By Kirk Jenkins on June 17, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This time, we’re reviewing the reversal rates for the Divisions of the Second District in civil cases from 2010 through 2019.

Overall for Second District cases, the reversal rates were 100% in wills and estates, domestic relations and property law cases.  The reversal rate was 80% for arbitration law and commercial law.  The rate was 75% for insurance law, 64.71% in employment law, 63.64% for tort law and 60% in government, environmental and constitutional law.  In civil procedure law, the reversal rate was 58.62%.  The rate was 50% in tax law and zero in workers compensation.

The reversal rate in employment law cases was 100% for Divisions One and Four, 50% in Divisions Six and Eight, 33.3% in Division Three and zero in Divisions Two and Seven.  In tort cases, the reversal rate for the decade was 100% in Divisions Six and Eight, 75% in Division One, two-thirds for Divisions Three and Four, 50% in Division Seven and 42.9% in Division Five.  Six Divisions had reversal rates of 100% in government and administrative law – Four, Five, Six, Seven and Eight.  Division One was at 50%, Division Three was at 33.3% and the reversal rate for Division Two was zero.  Divisions Two and Six had reversal rates of 100% in constitutional law cases.  Two-thirds of constitutional law cases from Division Three were reversed.  The rate was 50% for Divisions One and Five and zero in Division Four.  The reversal rate in civil procedure cases was 75% in Division Three, 71.4% in Division One, two-thirds in Divisions Five and Eight, 50% in Division Four and 33.3% in Division Two.

Join us next time as we review the data for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Districts.

Image courtesy of Flickr by zoxcleb (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo