Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

An Update on DOJ Enforcement Actions Alleging PPP Loan and Healthcare-Related COVID-19 Fraud  

By Robert B. Hille & GRSD Healthcare Team on July 3, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force was established in May 2021 to utilize the resources of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and various governmental agencies to combat COVID-19-related fraud. These efforts have led to investigations and prosecutions involving Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) fraud as well as healthcare-related COVID-19 fraud, the extent, and implications of which is only now becoming clear.

The DOJ is looking to cast a wide net around what it sees as healthcare-related COVID-19 fraud. Kevin Chambers, Director for COVID-19 enforcement for the DOJ, has described such coordinated efforts as “extraordinary” with the purpose being “to prosecute some of the largest and most-wide ranging pandemic frauds detected to date.”

At this writing, nearly two dozen defendants from across the U.S. have been charged for their alleged participation in such schemes. Federal law enforcement agencies that are involved include the Federal Bureau of Investigations, Department of Homeland Security; Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigations; and the Postal Inspection Service.

The subjects and targets of healthcare-related COVID-19 fraud cases vary from alleged bogus telemedicine encounters, to falsifying COVID-19 vaccination cards, to misuse of relief funds – and from medical professionals to manufacturers and distributors, respectively. In Florida, a medical professional was charged with healthcare fraud for allegedly billing bogus telemedicine encounters that did not legitimately occur during the pandemic. In California, a pharmacy director was accused of using actual vaccine lot numbers to falsify COVID-19 vaccination cards. Here in New Jersey, a postal service employee was charged with conspiracy for allegedly participating in a scheme to distribute fraudulent COVID-19 vaccination record cards to unvaccinated people. In Pennsylvania, an individual was charged with knowingly creating and possessing an unauthorized COVID-19 vaccination card, which bore an official government insignia.

Charges have also been brought against individuals for misappropriating the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund (PRF) monies meant to reimburse eligible medical providers for increased costs or lost revenue caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. An individual in California who owned and operated healthcare and hospice companies pleaded guilty to theft of government property because of his misuse of PRF monies, misappropriating nearly $200,000 worth of allocated PRF monies for personal use rather than for its intended purpose – to ensure continued relief and access to medical care. Moreover, the Center for Program Integrity, as a part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has taken corresponding administrative actions against medical providers accused of such alleged wrongdoings.

It may become challenging for the government to discern between PPP loan borrowers that intended and affirmatively acted to commit fraud and those that were well-intentioned but nonetheless failed to comply with this fast-tracked federal relief program. As a result, many unwitting borrowers may find themselves caught in the DOJ’s fishnet of fraud charges. It is therefore critical for healthcare entities that received PPP funds to immediately review their compliance, mitigate any non-compliance, and address corrective measures and exposure to enforcement with the appropriate government agency. Moreover, healthcare providers, owners and executives of medical businesses, physicians, and healthcare marketers and manufacturers should keep careful track of their billing practices, including billing for telemedicine, and institute safeguards to ensure COVID-19 relief funds are not being intentionally or negligently misused.

 

Photo of Robert B. Hille Robert B. Hille

Partner, Healthcare and Litigation

Bob is a civil and criminal trial attorney who represents clients in litigation in state and federal courts, and before federal and state administrative boards and agencies. His areas of concentration include professional liability defense, professional ethics, disputes involving…

Partner, Healthcare and Litigation

Bob is a civil and criminal trial attorney who represents clients in litigation in state and federal courts, and before federal and state administrative boards and agencies. His areas of concentration include professional liability defense, professional ethics, disputes involving healthcare providers, insurance coverage matters, white-collar criminal defense, regulatory issues, and legal issues associated with the use of technology and AI, including those related to professional ethics.

Bob has considerable expertise related to professional ethics for legal and healthcare industry professionals. He represents attorneys facing allegations of ethical violations in disciplinary actions before the District Ethics Committee (DEC), in Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) investigations and prosecutions, and in proceedings before the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) and the New Jersey Supreme Court, in matters ranging from suspension to dismissal to disbarment.

In the healthcare sector, Bob represents physicians and other licensed healthcare professionals in professional board inquiries and investigations, including those involving alleged violations of medical ethics and alleged breaches of standards of care. His white-collar experience includes involvement in both state and federal investigations, including those related to healthcare fraud and abuse and the taking of fraudulent payments from government entities.

In the area of insurance coverage, Bob has litigated numerous lawsuits. He represents business policyholders in complex insurance coverage litigation with the goal of maximizing the value of insurance assets by aggressively disputing unwarranted denials of coverage. He provides coverage analysis and opinions, interpreting the scope of coverage for pending or potential claims under commercial general liability (CGL), directors & officers (D&O), errors & omissions (E&O), and other types of policies. Bob vigorously represents clients at the trial and appellate levels to resolve disputes concerning an insurer’s duty to defend and duty to indemnify. This includes prosecuting declaratory judgment actions and claims for breach of contract. He has pursued extra-contractual claims against insurers for wrongful or unreasonable delay and denial of payment in “bad faith” litigation with the objective of ensuring that clients recover the full benefits of their policies.

Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney, Bob has served as an amicus representative for professional and business associations on a number of matters before the Supreme Court.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Contact information:

rhille@greenbaumlaw.com | 973.577.1808 | vCard  | LinkedIn

For more information visit the Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP website.

Email
Show more Show less
GRSD Healthcare Team

Healthcare Practice

From regulatory issues to complex transactional and litigation matters to day-to-day business counseling, today’s healthcare industry faces a myriad of legal challenges that require the depth and breadth of a well-rounded and experienced team of professionals. The attorneys in the Healthcare…

Healthcare Practice

From regulatory issues to complex transactional and litigation matters to day-to-day business counseling, today’s healthcare industry faces a myriad of legal challenges that require the depth and breadth of a well-rounded and experienced team of professionals. The attorneys in the Healthcare practice at Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis possess a sophisticated understanding of the unique healthcare business environment, both here in New Jersey and beyond.

The members of the firm’s healthcare team counsel a roster of clients that includes many of New Jersey’s foremost healthcare systems, hospitals and medical facilities, medical staffs, organized delivery systems (ODSs), clinically integrated networks (CINs), independent practice associations (IPAs), physicians and physician group practices, dentists and dental practices, physician and hospital-physician joint ventures, pharmaceutical companies, managed care organizations, home health agencies, nursing homes, behavioral health organizations, healthcare industry vendors, medical device manufacturers, management service organizations (MSOs), private equity firms, and industry-associated financial and corporate entities. This inclusive representation has propelled the team to statewide and national prominence within the healthcare field.

Our comprehensive healthcare practice encompasses numerous areas of focus. The attorneys in this practice area possess the requisite targeted expertise and hands-on experience to effectively represent a broad range of healthcare industry clients across a spectrum of legal concerns

Visit our website to contact the Healthcare Practice.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo