Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Where Do the Supreme Court’s Civil Cases From the First District Originate (Part 1 – 1990-1999)

By Kirk Jenkins on July 10, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This time, we’re beginning a new series, looking at the geographic spread of the Court’s civil docket.  We’ll assess two issues: (1) does the spread of civil cases track – at least across longer periods – the distribution of population; and (2) how does the distribution of cases change over time.

We begin with the First District for the years 1990 through 1999.  Population distribution is reported in Table 1483, which shows the percentage of the total District population accounted for by each county.  Alameda County is the biggest county in the First, with 26.86% of the District.  Contra Costa has 17.65%, San Francisco 14.45% and San Mateo accounts for 13.16% of the District.  Sonoma is 8.53% and Solano County is 7.34%.  The remaining counties are smaller.

The distribution of cases for the nineties did not track the population distribution.  The Court decided 38 cases from San Francisco County, 16 from Alameda and 13 from San Mateo County.  The Court had nine cases from Contra Costa County, eight from Solano and seven from Marin County.  The remaining counties contributed only scattered cases during the nineties.

Next time we’ll look at the data for the Second District.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Giuseppe Milo (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo