Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CFPB Targets FinTech for Faulty Automated Savings Algorithm

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal & Pouneh Almasi on August 18, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Finance-and-Fintech-Blog-Image-Depository-660x283

On August 10, the CFPB issued a consent order against a FinTech company for a faulty algorithm utilized in its personal finance management app that caused consumer accounts to overdraft and incur overdraft penalties. According to the CFPB, although the San Francisco-based fintech company promoted the app as a savings tool for consumers, it engaged in deceptive acts or practices in violation of the CFPA by:

  • Falsely claiming a “no overdraft guarantee” – although the FinTech represented that it “never transfers more than you can afford” and claimed to offer “no overdraft guarantee,” it routinely caused consumers to incur overdraft fees charged by their banks.
  • Failing to reimburse overdraft fees – the FinTech claimed that it would reimburse consumers if there was an overdraft, but often denied consumer requests for reimbursement.
  • Keeping interest earned – despite claiming that it would not keep any interest earned on consumer funds it was holding, the FinTech kept the interest earned.

The CFPB’s consent order enjoins the FinTech company from making any further misrepresentations related to its “auto-save” algorithm, requires the company to pay at least $68,145 in consumer redress for rejecting reimbursement requests for overdraft fees incurred, and payment of $2.7 million in civil penalties.

Putting It Into Practice: This recent enforcement action demonstrates that FinTechs are a focal point for allegations of consumer protection violations through their use of algorithms to determine consumer outcomes, including outside of the fair lending context. Consistent with this consent order, FinTechs should ensure that its’ algorithms do not function in a manner that runs afoul of consumer protection laws—for example, by producing results that contradict the companies’ guarantees and promises to consumers. Similarly, companies should note that this latest action also highlights another one of the CFPB’s current policy pushes: reining in overdraft fees.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Pouneh Almasi Pouneh Almasi

Pouneh Almasi is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s San Francisco office.

Read more about Pouneh AlmasiEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo