Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Dr. Oz Suit Shows Not All Class Actions Result in Millions of Dollars

By Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr. on August 19, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

There is a public perception that class actions result in multimillion-dollar liability for the defendants. The recent settlement of Woodard v. Labrada, a case in which TV’s Dr. Mehmet Oz was originally named as a defendant, shows that is not always the case. The suit alleged misrepresentations regarding certain weight-loss supplements manufactured by Labrada Bodybuilding Nutrition, Inc., which the plaintiffs claimed Dr. Oz received compensation to promote on his TV show. After six years of litigation, Labrada — the only remaining defendant (the plaintiffs dismissed the allegations against Dr. Oz and other media defendants) — agreed to a settlement that requires the payment of just $625,000.

In 2018, the judge denied a motion for preliminary approval of a $5.25 million settlement. The claims against Dr. Oz and other media defendants were subsequently dismissed with prejudice in 2020. And in 2021, the court certified two classes of people in California who purchased Labrada Green Coffee Bean Extract Product and Labrada Garcinia Cambogia Product.

The judge has granted preliminary approval of the $625,000 settlement. In addition to the monetary payment, the current proposed settlement also requires Labrada to cease selling the Labrada Green Coffee Bean Extract Product and Labrada Garcinia Cambogia Product. Unlike the rejected 2018 settlement, the current settlement is limited to California residents.

The preliminary approval order notes that the plaintiff “acknowledges the hurdles she would need to overcome to succeed on the merits of her case,” such as “determining whether the products at issue were actually ineffective.” Those hurdles can help justify a lower monetary component to a class-action settlement and explain why not every class action should result in a million-dollar payment.

Photo of Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr. Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr.

Mike has represented companies in nation-wide class actions, including matters related to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, consumer issues, employment issues, and insurance rates. In addition, Mike has experience in disputes related to technology issues, such as IT architecture, intellectual property, social media…

Mike has represented companies in nation-wide class actions, including matters related to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, consumer issues, employment issues, and insurance rates. In addition, Mike has experience in disputes related to technology issues, such as IT architecture, intellectual property, social media and cybersecurity issues. Mike also represents businesses and individuals in lawsuits related to contract disputes, mergers and acquisitions disputes, noncompete agreements and restrictive covenants, business valuation disputes, UCC issues, and commercial leases.

Read more about Michael J. Zbiegien, Jr.EmailMichael's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Class Action & Mass Torts
  • Blog:
    Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Organization:
    Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo