Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Briefing is Over – Now What? (Part 2 – Average Days from Completion of All Briefing to Oral Argument, 1990-2022)

By Kirk Jenkins on September 9, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This time, we’re measuring the length of Supreme Court review in civil cases by an alternative measure – the average number of days from the close of briefing to oral argument.  One caveat – this data set runs from the close of all briefing – including amici and any supplemental briefs – to oral argument.  Accordingly, the numbers can be skewed at least a bit if an amicus happens to appear at the last moment, or in the very rare cases where the Court requests supplemental briefing just before oral argument.

Overall, the number has been relatively steady since 1990.  We begin in 1990 with 228.6 days.  From 1993 through 1998, the number dipped below 200.  The average wait reached 297.4 days by 206 and bounced around in the mid-200s for the rest of the decade.  Lag time reached 385.5 days in 2017.  In 2018, it fell all the way to 233.5 days.  In 2019, the average wait for argument was 244.3 days.  There was a one-year increase in 2020 to 342.6 days before the average wait settled back down again to 250.9 days in 2021 and 254.1 days in 2022.

Join us back here next time as we turn our attention to a new topic.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Alex Beattie (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo