Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

How Long Will Supreme Court Review Take? (Part 1 – Average Days From Grant of Review to Oral Argument, 1990-2022)

By Kirk Jenkins on September 9, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Today, we’re looking at a new topic, tracking the average time Supreme Court review takes for civil cases.  In this and the following post, we measure the lag time in two ways: below, from the grant of review to oral argument, and in the next post, from the close of briefing to argument.

We report the data from grant of review to argument in Table 1520 below.  We begin in 1990 at 449.6 days.  The average dips a bit from there, remaining in the 300s from 1993 through 1998 before increasing to the mid-400s for the six years following.  By 2005, Supreme Court review was up to 532.8 days, and it remained in that neighborhood until 2010.  By 2014, the average length of review had reached 609.4 days, and with the exception of 2019 and 2022 (so far), it has remained in the 600s ever since.  In 2018, the average civil case lasted 660.2 days.  In 2019, the number dipped to 583, but in 2020, it was back to 638.7.  In 2021, cases averaged 607.3 days.  Year-to-date in 2022, the average case is taking, from grant to oral argument, 586.8 days.

Next up: average length of cases measured from the end of briefing through oral argument.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Laila Goubran (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo