Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Nerlens Noel’s Case Against Rich Paul Pushed To Arbitration

By Darren Heitner on September 12, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Remember the lawsuit that Nerlens Noel filed against Rich Paul and Klutch Sports Group a little over a year ago? You know, the one where Noel claimed that Paul interfered with his preexisting relationship with agent Happy Walters, promised Noel that he was a “$100 million man,” told Noel not to accept a $70 million offer from the Dallas Mavericks, and only focused on his marquee clients?

Well, the case is still going on. It is technically closed, but only because it was shifted, on September 9, from federal court to arbitration. The judge was very thorough in her explanation for why it was kicked out of court.

The decision notes that, under the Federal Arbitration Act, there exists a strong policy favoring arbitration before litigation. The judge looked at the arbitration clause in the Standard Player Agent Contract (SPAC) between Noel and Paul, which states,

Arbitration: Resolution of All Disputes Arising Out of This Agreement
Any and all disputes between the Player and the Agent involving the meaning, interpretation, application, or enforcement of this Agreement or the obligations of the parties under this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively through the Arbitration procedure set forth in Section 5 of the NBPA Regulations Governing Player Agents. As provided in Section 5(D) of those Regulations, if any arbitration hearing takes place, the NBPA may participate and present, by testimony or otherwise, any evidence relevant to the dispute. Because of the uniquely internal nature of any such dispute that may arise under this Agreement, the Player and the Agent agree that the arbitrator’s award shall constitute a final and binding resolution of the dispute and neither party will seek judicial review on any ground.

The Court found that Noel’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and breach of the duties of good faith and fair dealing each fall within the scope of the SPAC’s arbitration clause. It is a decision that strengthens the National Basketball Players Association’s role when it comes to adjudicating disputes between players and agents.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Sports Agent Blog
  • Organization:
    Sports Agent
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo