Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Texas Central Wins Authority to Take Land for High-Speed Rail System

By Barclay Nicholson & Erica Gibbons on September 27, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Move over luxury bus lines and quick flights. Central Texans should be on the lookout for bulldozers and train stops. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of Texas held that Texas Central Railroad & Infrastructure, Inc. and related entities (collectively “Texas Central”) have eminent domain authority to acquire property for a proposed high-speed rail system between Dallas and Houston.[1] Specifically, the Court held that the corporation qualifies as an “interurban electric railway company” under the Texas Transportation Code. This ruling grants Texas Central the broad condemnation authority to procure land for the project.

Texas Central has Statutory Authority to Take Land

The plaintiff in the matter, a farm owner with property south of Dallas along the proposed path of the bullet train, challenged the companies power to condemn land. The landowner’s declaratory judgment action challenged Texas Central’s eminent-domain authority. Under Texas law, condemnation power must be conferred by the legislature, either expressly or by necessary implication.[2]

Here, Texas Central was created for the purpose of constructing, acquiring, maintaining, or operating lines of electric railway between Texas municipalities. The Court found that Texas Central is engaged in activities to further that purpose. Therefore, the Court concluded, that although legislators did not contemplate high-speed railways at the time of drafting the Transportation Code, Texas Central nonetheless qualified as “interurban electric railway companies” under the statute.

The Texas Transportation Code grants eminent domain powers to corporations commissioned for the purpose of constructing, acquiring, maintaining, or operating lines of electric railway between municipalities in Texas for the transportation of freight, passengers, or both. The Court further held that Texas Central does not have to demonstrate a “reasonable probability that the railway will be successfully completed.”[3]

Impact on Texans and Industries

Approximately 24,300 people travel daily between Dallas and Houston by air or personal vehicle.[4] Thus, the demand for easy travel between the two major cities exists. The proposed railway system cuts the nearly four-hour drive to approximately 90 minutes. Now that Texas Central has eminent domain authority, investors will likely emerge to back the high-speed rail project.

Beyond the shorter commute, the project will impact many communities and industries. For example, Texas Central will need to commence the eminent domain process on effected lands along the railway path. The land taking process in Texas involves a hearing on the just and adequate compensation of the property. This affects landowners in the high-speed rail pathway. Further, Texas Central will need to construct the railway, which will involve a substantial construction project leading to bids, and later the project management and monitoring of the railway construction.

FOOTNOTES

[1] Miles v. Tex. Cent. R.R. & Infrastructure, Inc., 647 S.W.3d 613 (Tex. 2022)

[2] See Tex. Const. art. 1, § 17.

[3] Miles, 647 S.W.3d at 627.

[4] https://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/news/2020/04/15/texas-central-high-speed-rail.html#:~:text=Between%20personal%20vehicles%20and%20air,Dallas%20and%20Houston%20every%20day

Photo of Barclay Nicholson Barclay Nicholson

Barclay Nicholson is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Houston office.

Read more about Barclay NicholsonEmail
Photo of Erica Gibbons Erica Gibbons

Erica Gibbons is an attorney in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Houston office.

Read more about Erica GibbonsEmail
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Construction & Infrastructure Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Internet, IT & e-Discovery
  • P3 For Texas
  • DSE Advisors
  • Innocelf Knowledge
  • Labor & Employment Blog
Copyright © 2023, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo