Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Shanghai Issues White Paper and Typical Cases on Proof of Foreign Law

By Publisher on October 24, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 13 Sept. 2022, Shanghai High People’s Court held a press conference to issue the Chinese-English bilingual version of “White Paper on Proof of Foreign Law in Foreign-related Commercial Trials in Shanghai (2015-2021) ” (hereinafter “the White Paper”, 上海涉外商事审判域外法查明白皮书(2015-2021)) and typical relevant cases for the first time.

In a foreign-related civil or commercial case,[1] when the parties agree to apply certain foreign law or the applicable law is determined according to the conflict norms, the court needs to find out the content of the foreign law via some channels or in some means.

Whether the foreign law can be determined and correctly applied will affect the affirmation of the substantive rights and obligations of the parties and the outcome.

The White Paper summarizes the features that have been identified in the foreign-related commercial trials subject to proof of foreign law in Shanghai courts since 2015.

1. Methods of proof

According to the White Paper, the channels for proof of foreign law in foreign-related commercial cases heard in Shanghai courts since 2015 include the proof by parties directly, proof by experts entrusted by litigants, proof by experts entrusted by courts and proof by judges directly.

In the practice, the judge may determine the foreign law by searching the Internet during a court session, and the litigants may also provide foreign law based on the academic publications or the foreign judgments that have come into force.

2. Demand for proof

Litigants’ demand for proof of foreign law can be various. According to a sampling analysis in the White Paper, the proof of statutory law accounts for 68.10%, precedents for 25.23%, burden of litigation costs, arbitration and other procedural matters for 4.7%, and international treaties and practices for 1.97%.

3. Role of experts and institutions

When there are discrepancies in understanding the foreign laws between the litigants, the legal opinions issued by proof of foreign law experts as entrusted by the court is an additional means to the proof of foreign law.

As of 2021, the Center of Proof of Foreign Law in East China University of Political Science and Law had accepted over 20 requests for the proof of foreign law by Shanghai courts.

At the press conference, the Shanghai High People’s Court also released nine typical cases on the proof and application of foreign laws involving the United States, Singapore, Switzerland, Japan, and Hong Kong SAR in foreign-related commercial trials in recent years.

 

[1] Unless otherwise specified, the term “foreign-related cases/disputes” also includes those relating to Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.

 

 

Cover Photo by Bide Cui on Unsplash

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    China Justice Observer
  • Organization:
    China University of Political Science and Law
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo