Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Reviewing Declining Dockets, Part 2 – New Original Proceedings, 1996-2000

By Kirk Jenkins on November 6, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This is part 2 in a series of posts reviewing the dockets at the Court of Appeal for the past thirty-plus years and their impact on the work of the Supreme Court.  This time, we review the data for newly filed original writ proceedings.

We showed last time that Notices of Appeal declined between 1996 and 2000, although not as sharply as they have recently.  But in contrast, writ petitions actually increased.  In 1996, there were 1,320 writ petitions in the First District.  In 2000, there were 1,456.  Filings were up more than ten percent in the Second District between 1996 and 1997 before stepping back a bit.  There were 759 new writ petitions in the Third District in 1996 and 873 in 2000.  Petitions in the Fourth District were up a bit, from 1,956 in 1996 to 2,108 in 2000.  Filings were up sharply in the Fifth District – by 30% – and in the Sixth District, by 21%.  There were 598 new petitions in the Fifth in 1996, growing to 778 by 2000.  There were 375 petitions in the Sixth District in 1996, growing to 455 in 2000.

Next time, we’ll review the Notices of Appeal and original proceedings data for the years 2001 through 2010.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Tracie Hall (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo