Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FCC Seeks to Fill Challenging Gap in STIR/SHAKEN Robocall Defenses

By Brianna Perrone & Tony Lee on November 30, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The FCC Launches Formal Review of How to Bring Non-IP Phone Networks into Caller ID Authentication Ecosystem to Protect Consumers

On October 27, 2022, the FCC released a Notice of Inquiry which launches a formal review to consider ways to improve the accuracy of robocall blocking and consumer warning tools for phone networks that are not IP-based.  In light of the record developed in response to the Commission’s May 2022 Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Notice of Inquiry seeks comment on industry progress toward developing a caller ID authentication framework for non-IP networks, and the impact this technology has on the problem of illegal robocalls.  The Commission also seeks input on alternative technological or policy solutions to enable caller ID authentication over non-IP networks including the two standards developed by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) discussed below.

In 2019, Congress recognized the scope of the problem posed by illegal robocalls and caller ID spoofing and passed the TRACED Act.  Among other provisions, the TRACED Act directed the FCC to require voice service providers to implement caller ID authentication technology.  Last year, the FCC attempted to curb this practice by requiring that carriers nationwide authenticate all calls using a technology called STIR/SHAKEN.  STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication combats illegally spoofed robocalls by allowing voice service providers to verify that the caller ID information transmitted with a call matches the caller’s number.  When this network technology is present, consumers can trust that when the phone rings the caller is who they say they are.

While STIR/SHAKEN has proven effective on networks that rely on Internet Protocol (“IP”) technology, it does not work in the same way on older parts of the public situated telephone networks that use traditional copper lines.  For STIR/SHAKEN to work, voice service providers attach encrypted digital certificates on messages as they pass from network to network.  Non-IP networks cannot add or maintain this digital information on calls; thus, any call generated by or passing through a non-IP network does not carry with it any STIR/SHAKEN verification information, including information that an originating voice service provider knows about the caller and its relationship to the phone number it is using along with the call itself.  Even if both the calling party and the terminating party use carriers that have adopted IP technology, the authentication data associated with a call is lost if it passes through a non-IP interconnection point or the network of an intermediate provider employing non-IP technology.

Voice service providers using non-IP network technologies must comply with one of two Commission regulations.  Either they must upgrade their entire network to IP and adopt STIR/SHAKEN, or they must get involved (directly or through a representative) in industry initiatives to create a non-IP caller ID identification solution.  ATIS established the Non-IP Call Authentication Task Force in May 2020 to create solutions for non-IP networks.  For the exchange of authenticated caller ID data on non-IP networks, this Task Force published two standards in August 2021: ATIS-1000095, extending STIR/SHAKEN over TDM (time-division multiplexing – commonly used on older copper-based networks), which the Task Force updated with a second version released in August 2022, and ATIS-1000096, Signature-based Handling of Asserted information using toKENs (SHAKEN): Out-of-Band PASSporT Transmission Involving TDM Networks.

The non-IP networks are the most significant remaining gap in implementing the STIR/SHAKEN framework over all phone networks.  Last year, the Commission required most voice service providers to have implemented STIR/SHAKEN and start using it on their IP-based networks.  The only remaining extensions granted are for facilities-based small voice service providers, which have until June 30, 2023, to implement these provisions.  The FCC’s action is a move that closes critical loopholes in the STIR/SHAKEN call authentication regime and brings the FCC one step closer to national implementation of STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication.

The FCC is seeking comments on, among other things, (1) whether the FCC should require implementation of one or both standards set by the Non-IP Call Authentication Task Force, (2) the prevalence of non-IP network technology across the entire voice network, and (3) the extent to which non-IP Network Technology contributes to the problem of illegal robocalls.

Comments are due December 12, 2022, and Replies are due January 11, 2023.

Want to file comments to the Notice of Inquiry?  Contact your friendly Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth attorney to get started today!

Photo of Tony Lee Tony Lee

Tony Lee focuses his practice on representing wireline and wireless telecommunications carriers, cable TV, and Internet companies in regulatory issues and proceedings before the FCC and state utility commissions. Mr. Lee advises local exchange and long distance carriers regarding state and federal regulatory…

Tony Lee focuses his practice on representing wireline and wireless telecommunications carriers, cable TV, and Internet companies in regulatory issues and proceedings before the FCC and state utility commissions. Mr. Lee advises local exchange and long distance carriers regarding state and federal regulatory issues, including intercarrier compensation, universal service and compliance matters. He is engaged in substantive and complex litigation in federal court, and before the Federal Communications Commission and state commissions.

Read more about Tony LeeEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo