Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Reviewing Declining Dockets, Part 4 – Original Proceedings, 2001-2010

By Kirk Jenkins on December 2, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Today, we’re reviewing the data for new original proceedings – petitions for writ of mandate, mandamus and the like – between 2001 and 2010.  With the exception of the Fifth District, which saw a 24% increase in original proceedings, the remaining Courts of Appeal saw relatively flat numbers in original proceedings.

The First District began the decade with 1,456 new original proceedings in 2000.  That fell all the way to 1,314 in 2006 before increasing to 1,426 in 2008.  In 2010, there were 1,313 new original proceedings in the First.  There were 3,225 new original proceedings in the Second District.  That dropped to a low of 2,982 in 2004 before bouncing back to 3,101 in 2010.

There were 873 new original proceedings filed in the Third District in 2000.  There were 884 in 2003, 869 in 2005 and 1,056 in 2008 before falling back slightly to 979 in 2010.

There were 2,108 new original proceedings in the Fourth District in 2000.  That was down slightly to 2,019 in 2005 before rising to 2,243 new proceedings in 2007.  There were 1,954 new proceedings in 2010.

There were 778 new original proceedings in the Fifth District in 2000.  That number rose steadily throughout the decade, reaching 978 in 2005 and 1,021 in 2007.  There were 966 new original proceedings in 2010.

There were 455 new original proceedings in the Sixth District in 2000.  There was a slight decline in 2005 (435) and 2006 (426), but new filings were back up after that, settling at 464 in 2010.

Next time, we’ll review the data for new notices of appeal and original proceedings for the years 2011 through 2020.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Sergei Mutovkin (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo