Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FERC Conditionally Accepts PJM Interconnection Reforms for a First-Ready, First-Served Clustered Cycle Approach

By Sahara Shrestha, S. Jennifer Panahi & Russell Kooistra on December 9, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On November 29, 2022, FERC conditionally accepted PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.’s (“PJM”) tariff revisions to transition from a serial first-come, first-served generator interconnection queue process to a first-ready, first-served clustered cycle approach. FERC found that the revisions will help reduce interconnection queue backlogs and delays.

Order No. 2003 required all public utilities that own, control, or operate jurisdictional transmission facilities to adopt standardized procedures and agreements to govern the interconnection of generating facilities larger than 20 MW, known as the pro forma large generator interconnection procedures (“LGIP”) and pro forma large generator interconnection agreement (“LGIA”), respectively. Despite this standardization, Order No. 2003 allows regional transmission organizations (“RTOs”) and independent system operators (“ISOs”) to modify these pro forma procedures if such modifications satisfy the “independent entity variation” standard. The independent entity variation standard is met when the RTO/ISO demonstrates that the proposed variation (1) is just and reasonable, and not unduly discriminatory or preferential, and (2) accomplishes Order No. 2003’s general purpose.

On June 14, 2022, PJM filed to revise its pro forma interconnection process. The proposed move to a first-ready, first-served clustered cycle approach will group projects in three-phase cluster cycles for the purposes of studying and allocating costs. In support of the revisions, PJM explained that the reforms would (1) “reduce the current request backlog,” (2) “increase process efficiency to prevent a future backlog,” and (3) “decrease uncertainty for all affected entities by separating out projects that are not ready to proceed to commercial operation or that are otherwise too speculative to complete the interconnection process.”

In accepting PJM’s filing, FERC found that PJM’s first-ready, first-served cluster approach satisfies the first prong of the independent entity variation standard because it will enable PJM to reduce the current backlog quicker than its current rules and will allow for a more efficient and timely processing of New Service Requests. FERC also found the revisions consistent with the purposes of Order No. 2003 because they encourage project developers to complete generation projects in a timely manner. FERC reasoned that PJM’s first-ready, first-served clustered cycle approach and other reforms directed at minimizing the number of speculative and non-ready projects entering the queue would improve PJM’s ability to address queue backlogs. The Commission emphasized that it has, and will continue to afford RTOs/ISOs “considerable flexibility in the chosen approach to address region-specific queue processing challenges.” As a condition of accepting the revisions, the Commission also required PJM, within 30 days from the date of its order, to add tariff language indicating that New Service Requests that do not result in network upgrades or subsequent studies may bypass certain intermediary steps and accelerate to a final interconnection-related agreement (one of the last steps in the interconnection process).

A copy of the order can be found here.

Photo of Sahara Shrestha Sahara Shrestha

Sahara represents clients in the hydropower, natural gas, and electric utility sector before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the D.C. Circuit. She advises hydropower clients on all aspects of FERC licensing and compliance under the Federal Power Act, as well as…

Sahara represents clients in the hydropower, natural gas, and electric utility sector before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the D.C. Circuit. She advises hydropower clients on all aspects of FERC licensing and compliance under the Federal Power Act, as well as issues arising under other federal statutes, including the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Endangered Species Act. Sahara also advises natural gas clients in certificate proceedings and compliance matters, and advises electric utility clients on transmission, interconnection, and market design issues.

Read more about Sahara ShresthaEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Russell Kooistra Russell Kooistra

Russell Kooistra counsels an array of energy companies on various issues related to natural gas and electricity markets. Russell uses his in-depth knowledge of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) policy and regulations to advise clients on complex regulatory matters.

Read more about Russell KooistraEmail
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    Washington Energy Report
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo