Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The New Containment: How the Semiconductor Industry Came to Be at the Heart of the Technological Cold War

By Reid Whitten & J. Scott Maberry on December 21, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As you may have heard here (and here and here), in October 2022, the United States issued sweeping measures aimed at the semiconductor industry in China. The new regulations restrict the export of semiconductors and related technology, manufacturing equipment, software, and even U.S.-person support, to China. The regulations are part of a high-stakes chess match between the United States and China, as they compete for technological and economic dominance. One important result of this struggle is that the global semiconductor industry is being squeezed by the regulatory and geopolitical pressure exerted by both sides.

Now, as 2022 comes to a close, the United States is calling on its allies to impose similar export restrictions on China. This move is a strong expansion of the efforts to restrict China’s access to advanced semiconductors and related know-how. In our view, it is also a throwback to the old Truman Doctrine concept of containment. The Biden administration made it clear that the United States wants its allies to align with aggressive U.S. export controls on China.

More than two months after the release of the October 2022 regulations, discussions with U.S. allies on the issue are still continuing. The first two countries to come on board appear to be Japan and the Netherlands. White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said discussions with Japan and the Netherlands have taken place, without providing further details. Bloomberg reported that Japan and the Netherlands have reportedly agreed to join U.S. efforts to impose similar export restrictions. According to the report, both countries will join in banning “machines capable of making 14-nanometer or more advanced chips to China.”

Both Japan and the Netherlands are important players in the development of semiconductor technology and manufacturing. The U.S. government has been working hard to convince those particular allies to align, because they both have leading roles in cutting edge technologies. The Netherlands is a hub of chip manufacture and design, and the country also creates some of the most advanced chip production machines in the world. Japan is home to numerous chip designers and manufacturers as well as suppliers of chip manufacturing equipment.

We are still waiting for any official statements from the Netherlands and Japan outlining any specific measures they will adopt. However, the reported response by Japan and the Netherlands to what is clearly a concerted U.S. diplomatic effort may indicate that other countries will continue to be pushed to choose sides in this semiconductor cold war. On the other side, China is imposing its own export controls, “unreliable entity list,” and foreign direct investment restrictions. Additionally, on December 12, China’s Commerce Minister announced that the country had filed a trade dispute with the World Trade Organization to challenge the new U.S. export restrictions.

We will continue to follow the geopolitical developments and report here on how they impact global trade and, as in this case, specific industries.

Photo of Reid Whitten Reid Whitten

Reid is the Managing Partner of Sheppard Mullin’s London office, practicing in international trade regulations and investigations.

Read more about Reid WhittenEmail
Photo of J. Scott Maberry J. Scott Maberry

Scott Maberry is an international trade partner in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about J. Scott MaberryEmail
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Global Trade Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo