Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Reviewing Declining Dockets at the Court of Appeal, Part 6 – Original Proceedings, 2011-2021

By Kirk Jenkins on December 23, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The sharpest decline in original proceedings between 2011 and 2021 was in the Fourth District – 41.43%.  The Fifth District was second, declining 39.06%.  New filings in the Third District were down 38.43%.  New original proceedings are down in the First District by 31.52%.  New filings were down 26.03% in the Sixth District.  The smallest decline was in the Second District, where new original proceedings were down only 6.6%.

There were 2076 new original proceedings filed in the Fourth District in 2011.  That fell to 1625 in 2015.  There were only 1206 in 2020 and 1216 in 2021.  The Fifth District saw 991 new original proceedings in 2011 and 1022 in 2012.  New original proceedings fell to 691 in 2015, 627 in 2020 and 604 in 2021.  The Third District saw 1067 new original proceedings in 2011.  That fell to 707 in 2015 and reached a low point of 657 in 2021.  The First District saw 1298 new original proceedings in 2011, but that number dropped to 931 by 2015.  In 2020 there were 914 new original proceedings, and filings fell to 889 by 2021.  There were 465 new original proceedings in 2011 in the Sixth District.  New filings fell to 345 in 2015 before reaching their low point of 310 in 2016.  Since then, new filings in the Sixth District have drifted up slightly to 372 in 2020 and 344 in 2021.  There were 2278 new original proceedings in the Second District in 2011.  That increased to 2813 the following year, but it was a one-year bump, as things trended down to 2182 in 2018.  There were 2109 new original proceedings in the Second in 2019, 2054 in 2020 and 1900 in 2021.

Next time, we’ll turn our attention back to the Supreme Court, looking at data about its docket.Image courtesy of Flickr by Jan Arendtsz (no changes).

Photo of Kirk Jenkins Kirk Jenkins

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with…

Kirk Jenkins brings a wealth of experience to his appellate practice, which focuses on antitrust and constitutional law, as well as products liability, RICO, price fixing, information sharing among competitors and class certification. In addition to handling appeals, he also regularly works with trial teams to ensure that important issues are properly presented and preserved for appellate review.  Mr. Jenkins is a pioneer in the application of data analytics to appellate decision-making and writes two analytics blogs, the California Supreme Court Review and the Illinois Supreme Court Review, as well as regularly writing for various legal publications.

Read more about Kirk JenkinsEmailKirk's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Appellate and Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    California Supreme Court Review
  • Organization:
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo