Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

A Sigh of Relief: FAQs Confirm Relief for “Good Faith” Effort to Comply with New Prescription Drug Reporting Mandate

By Grant G. Uhler & Stephanie B. Vasconcellos on January 9, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As summarized in our prior post, on November 23, 2021, the Personnel Management Office, the Internal Revenue Service, the Employee Benefits Security Administration, and the Health and Human Services Department issued interim final rules setting forth directives for implementing a new prescription drug reporting mandate under the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 116-260). On June 29, 2022, updated submission instructions describing the reporting process were released. The first deadline to comply with the new rules was December 27, 2022. Under that guidance, it was still unclear whether the relevant departments intended to provide general relief for plans and issuers that made good-faith efforts to comply with the new law.


On December 23, 2022, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury issued FAQs addressing this question directly.


In the FAQs, the relevant departments expressly recognize “the significant operational challenges that plans and issuers may have encountered in complying with these reporting requirements” and acknowledge that “there may be errors or other issues with the first round of data submissions, despite good faith efforts by plans and issuers.” The FAQs confirm that for the 2020 and 2021 data submissions that were due by December 27, 2022, enforcement actions will not be taken with respect to any plan or issuer that uses a good faith, reasonable interpretation of the interim final rules and the updated submission instructions in making its submission.


The FAQs also provide a submission grace period through January 31, 2023, during which time plans and issuers will not be considered to be out of compliance with the new requirements, provided that a good faith submission of 2020 and 2021 data is made on or before January 31, 2023.


Lastly, the FAQs provide several clarifications with respect to the reporting requirements:

  • Multiple submissions by the same reporting entity are allowed;
  • More than one reporting entity may submit on behalf of the same plan or issuer;
  • Certain aggregation restrictions are suspended for 2020 and 2021 data only;
  • Certain group health plans submitting limited data (i.e., only the plan list, premium and life-years data and narrative response) may submit by email rather than HIOS;
  • Reporting on vaccines is optional; and
  • Reporting entities can leave certain fields related to deductibles and out of pocket maximum blank (but should not remove those columns).


If you have questions about potential relief for good faith efforts to comply, or any of the prescription drug pricing reporting requirements, contact a member of Mayer Brown’s Employee Benefits team.

Photo of Grant G. Uhler Grant G. Uhler
Email
Photo of Stephanie B. Vasconcellos Stephanie B. Vasconcellos
Read more about Stephanie B. VasconcellosEmailStephanie's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Benefits & Compensation Blog
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown

Have questions? Call 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Syndication Terms of Service
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo