Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AZ Attorney General Concludes Non-Recourse EWA Not a Loan

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal & Alyssa Paddock on January 12, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Finance-and-Fintech-Blog-Image-Depository-660x283

On December 18, the Arizona Attorney General issued an opinion on earned wage access (EWA), which determined that fully non-recourse EWA products do not constitute consumer loans subject to consumer loan regulations, and correspondingly, that providers of non-recourse EWA products would not be considered consumer lenders subject to licensure under Arizona law. The opinion found that an EWA product could be identified as fully non-recourse when the provider:

  • obtains no legal or contractual right to repayment against the employee;
  • does not engage in any debt collection activities with regard to any unpaid balance;
  • does not sell or assign any unpaid balance to a third party;
  • does not report non-payment to any consumer credit reporting agency; and
  • does not impose a “finance charge” as defined under applicable state law.

The opinion, which looked to Black Law Dictionary’s definition of a “loan,” concludes that non-recourse EWA products would be outside of the definition, and could be more adequately characterized as an acceleration of funds already earned. The opinion also pointed out that certain ancillary fees charged or revenues received by an EWA provider as part of providing an EWA product would not necessarily convert it to a loan subject to consumer loan regulations.

Putting it into Practice: As we’ve previously reported, EWA treatment has been a trending topic to date, with the Treasury Department and the CFPB issuing various iterations of guidance (see blog posts here, here, and here). The opinion is the first public opinion given by a state attorney general, but follows guidance from the CFPB, and further develops the broadening conversation happening around EWA’s interplay with consumer finance laws. Although its applicability only spans within state borders, the general analysis may be instructive to courts and regulators in other states, many of which have consumer laws similar to those of Arizona. When considering becoming an EWA provider or expanding EWA services, providers should be aware of the considerations that differentiate non-recourse EWA products from recourse EWA products, as well as the applicable state and federal laws and regulations.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Alyssa Paddock Alyssa Paddock

Alyssa Paddock is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Read more about Alyssa PaddockEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo