Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Iowa AG Usury Investigation into Bank Partnership Ends in Settlement

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal & Matt Benz on January 19, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Finance-and-Fintech-Blog-Image-Bank2-660x283

In December, a Utah-based bank and its service provider entered into an assurance of discontinuance with the Iowa Attorney General and the Iowa Division of Banking, settling an investigation into allegedly usurious installment loans that the bank made to Iowa consumers. The Iowa AG alleges that, between March 2020 and April 2022, the bank made more than 1,600 installment loans to Iowa residents that imposed excessive finance charges in violation of state and federal law. Some of these loans, according to the Iowa AG, carried interest rates of nearly 200 percent, far in excess of the maximum allowable finance charge of 21 percent under the Iowa Consumer Credit Code and the limits established by Section 521 of the federal Depository Institutions and Deregulation Monetary Control Act.

As part of the settlement, the bank agreed to cease making high-interest installment loans to Iowa residents and to provide restitution payments to Iowa consumers that were harmed by the bank’s allegedly usurious loans. The restitution payments will be in the amount that affected consumers overpaid after retroactively resetting their loans to have an effective APR of 21% and crediting any excess finance charge payments to the consumers’ account balance.

Putting it into Practice: This settlement is consistent with other settlements entered into by the Iowa AG in recent years and should be viewed in light of a broader nationwide focus by state and federal regulators to rein in so-called “rent-a-bank” schemes that allegedly attempt to skirt state-law interest rate caps on consumer loans. Allegations made by many state regulators include that rent-a-bank lending enables financing companies, primarily FinTechs, to avoid state usury laws by routing high-interest loans through out-of-state, federally regulated banks. In some cases, these financing arrangements are associated with high default rates, which has in turn spurred an increase in state legislation and enforcement actions to combat bank partnership arrangements that offer loans in excess of state lending laws (see previous blog post here, here, and here). The CFPB has also recently indicated that it is taking a close look at rent-a-bank operations (see previous blog post here). Fintech companies offering high-interest consumer loan products through out-of-state banks should therefore be aware that both state and federal regulators have their sights set on rent-a-bank operations and that further enforcement actions are likely forthcoming.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Matt Benz Matt Benz

Matt Benz is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Matt BenzEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo