Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Italian Garante Fines Three Hospitals Over Their Use of AI for Risk Stratification Purposes, Establishes That Predictive Medicine Processing Requires the Patient’s Explicit Consent

By Kristof Van Quathem & Allan Topol on February 23, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 24 January 2023, the Italian Supervisory Authority (“Garante”) announced it fined three hospitals in the amount of 55,000 EUR each for their unlawful use an artificial intelligence (“AI”) system for risk stratification purposes, i.e., to systematically categorize patients based on their health status. The Garante also ordered the hospitals to erase all the data they obtained as a consequence of that unlawful processing.

The hospitals used the AI technology to “profile” their patients, predict whether they may develop certain pathologies, sort them into the corresponding risk group and, based on that, assign a priority class to them in the hospitals’ waiting lists.  The hospitals indicated that, in essence, they used the AI for predictive medicine purposes, which is part of their standard healthcare activities (Article 9(2)(h) GDPR).  

The Garante, however, disagreed.  In particular, it considered that the processing of health data for the purposes of predicting whether a patient may develop certain pathologies “must be considered additional and autonomous to the processing strictly necessary for the standard activities of care and prevention (Article 9(2)(h) of the GDPR), and therefore can be carried out only on the basis of the specific informed consent of the data subject (Article 9(2)(a) of the GDPR).”  According to the Garante, the standard activities of prevention and care do not include automated patient profiling and risk scoring in order to develop a risk-stratified care management system.  

If confirmed throughout the EU, this restrictive interpretation by the Garante of what qualifies as “preventive medicine” and the “provision of health care” could have important ramifications for the introduction of a wide spectrum of AI and e-health technologies in healthcare.

***

The Covington Team is happy to provide advice or answer any questions you may have on the topic.  

Photo of Kristof Van Quathem Kristof Van Quathem

Kristof Van Quathem advises clients on information technology matters and policy, with a focus on data protection, cybercrime and various EU data-related initiatives, such as the Data Act, the AI Act and EHDS.

Kristof has been specializing in this area for over twenty…

Kristof Van Quathem advises clients on information technology matters and policy, with a focus on data protection, cybercrime and various EU data-related initiatives, such as the Data Act, the AI Act and EHDS.

Kristof has been specializing in this area for over twenty years and developed particular experience in the life science and information technology sectors. He counsels clients on government affairs strategies concerning EU lawmaking and their compliance with applicable regulatory frameworks, and has represented clients in non-contentious and contentious matters before data protection authorities, national courts and the Court of the Justice of the EU.

Kristof is admitted to practice in Belgium.

Read more about Kristof Van QuathemEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Allan Topol Allan Topol

Allan Topol is a resident in the firm’s Washington office.  While practicing law with Covington, he has written ten novels of international intrigue and numerous articles dealing with foreign policy issues in The Huffington Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and…

Allan Topol is a resident in the firm’s Washington office.  While practicing law with Covington, he has written ten novels of international intrigue and numerous articles dealing with foreign policy issues in The Huffington Post, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Military.com.

Allan’s law practice has involved extensive civil and criminal litigation, with an emphasis on water, air and major hazardous waste enforcement cases, as well as international environmental law and toxic torts.  He has also advised clients on many of these environmental issues assisting them in dealing with immediate problems as well as developing long term strategies.

In addition, Allan has represented clients in IP and commercial litigation, including patent infringement and contract cases.  He was admitted to the U.S. Patent Office in 1971.

Read more about Allan TopolEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Global Policy Watch
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo