Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

FDA Files Civil Money Penalty Complaints Against Four Small Vape Shops for Alleged Premarket Review Violations

By Azim Chowdhury & Ian Murray on February 24, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 22, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the filing of civil money penalty (CMP) complaints against four domestic e-liquid manufacturers, all of which appear to be small vape shops that were producing nicotine-containing e-liquids used in open-system electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) devices.[1] The four named companies are:

  • BAM Group LLC (d/b/a VapEscape)
  • Great American Vapes LLC (d/b/a Great American Vapes)
  • The Vapor Corner Inc. (d/b/a Vapor Corner Inc., The Vapor Corner, and Vapor Corner)
  • 13 Vapor Co. LLC (d/b/a 13 Vapor)

In response to the complaints, the companies must now either pay the penalty, enter into a settlement agreement, request an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint, or file an answer and request a hearing by an Administrative Law Judge.[2] The companies risk a default order imposing the full penalty amount—statutorily set at $19,192 for a single violation relating to tobacco products—if no action is taken within 30 days of receiving the complaint.[3]

FDA’s press release also stated that this is “the first time the FDA has filed CMP complaints against tobacco product manufacturers to enforce the [Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)] premarket review requirements for new tobacco products.”[4] It should be noted that this is not the first groundbreaking action FDA has taken against small vape shops within the last year. As reported on this blog on October 25, 2022, FDA filed permanent injunctions against six small vape shops for alleged premarket review violations.[5] FDA had noted at the time that “these cases represent the first time FDA has initiated injunction proceedings to enforce the [Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)] premarket review requirements for new tobacco products.”[6]

In the CMP complaints, FDA alleges that it previously warned each of the companies between late 2021 and early 2022 that they were in violation of the premarket review requirements set forth in the FFDCA and that follow-up inspections confirmed that the companies were continuing to manufacture and sell unauthorized e-liquid products.[7] Both BAM Group and Great American Vapes had previously submitted Premarket Tobacco Product Applications (PMTAs). However, FDA issued marketing denial orders to both companies, presumably for their non-tobacco flavored e-liquids in September 2021.[8] The Vapor Corner Inc. and 13 Vapor Co. LLC allegedly did not submit PMTAs. FDA has previously indicated that it is prioritizing enforcement against companies that have either not submitted PMTAs, whose PMTAs have been refused acceptance or filing by FDA, or whose PMTAs are subject to marketing denial orders.[9]  

FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) Office of Compliance and Enforcement (OCE) has broad responsibility to (1) develop and provide compliance training and education; (2) monitor regulated industry’s compliance via surveillance, inspections, and investigations; and (3) initiate advisory and enforcement actions. With regards to the scope of permitted enforcement actions, CTP has the power to issue warnings, civil money penalties, no-tobacco-sale orders, seizures, and injunctions and to initiate criminal prosecution. Between January 2021 through February 17, 2023, FDA has issued more than 550 warning letters to firms, mostly small U.S. businesses, for manufacturing, selling, and/or distributing new tobacco products without FDA marketing authorization.


[1] See FDA Files Civil Money Penalty Complaints Against Four E-Cigarette Product Manufacturers, available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-files-civil-money-penalty-complaints-against-four-e-cigarette-product-manufacturers.

[2] See 21 C.F.R. Part 17 (setting forth the practices and procedures for hearings concerning the administrative imposition of civil money penalties by FDA).

[3] This maximum amount for this civil monetary penalty was most recently adjusted for inflation in March 2022. See 87 Fed. Reg. 15,103 (March 17, 2022). The maximum total CMP for all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding is $1,279,448. 

[4] See FDA Files Civil Money Penalty Complaints Against Four E-Cigarette Product Manufacturers, available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-files-civil-money-penalty-complaints-against-four-e-cigarette-product-manufacturers.

[5] See FDA Files Permanent Injunctions Against Six Small Vape Shops for Alleged Premarket Review Violations, available at: https://www.thecontinuumofrisk.com/2022/10/fda-files-permanent-injunctions-against-six-small-vape-shops-for-alleged-premarket-review-violations/.

[6] See FDA, DOJ Seek Permanent Injunctions Against Six E-cigarette Manufacturers, available at: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-doj-seek-permanent-injunctions-against-six-e-cigarette-manufacturers?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery.

[7] See Complaint at 4-5, Center for Tobacco Products v. 13 Vapor Co., LLC (2023) (FDA Docket No. FDA-2023-U-0484); Complaint at 4-5, Center for Tobacco Products v. BAM Group, LLC (2023) (FDA Docket No. FDA-2023-U-0481); Complaint at 4-5, Center for Tobacco Products v. Great American Vapes LLC (2023) (FDA Docket No. FDA-2023-U-0483); Complaint at 4-5, Center for Tobacco Products v. Vapor Corner, Inc. (2023) (FDA Docket No. FDA-2023-U-0486).

[8] FDA keeps an updated listing of all companies that have received Marketing Denial Orders on its website. See Marketing Denial Orders, Food & Drug Admin. https://www.fda.gov/media/165602/download (last visited February 23, 2022).

[9] See https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-denies-authorization-market-juul-products (“As the FDA has stated in the past, unauthorized electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) products for which no application is pending, including for example, those with an MDO, are among our highest enforcement priorities.”)

Photo of Azim Chowdhury Azim Chowdhury

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of…

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and international regulatory compliance. In particular, he has developed expertise in tobacco and vapor product regulation relating to the implementation of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and spearheaded the Tobacco and E-Vapor practice at Keller and Heckman. Specifically, Mr. Chowdhury has experience representing tobacco, e-cigarette and e-liquid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, suppliers and trade associations in matters of FDA, state and global regulatory compliance. He also assists corporations in establishing clearances for food and drug additives in the U.S., Canada, and European Union, with an emphasis on indirect additives used in food-contact materials.

Mr. Chowdhury has authored and edited numerous articles and publications, including Tobacco Regulation and Compliance: An Essential Resource, FDA Regulation of Tobacco: A Comprehensive Guide – An FDLI Primer and Tobacco and Nicotine Delivery: Regulation and Compliance, 2nd Edition. He is a frequent contributor to the Food and Drug Law Institute’s (FDLI) Update Magazine and has served on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Food and Drug Law Journal.  In addition, he has been interviewed in the U.S. News and World Reports Best Lawyers Edition (2016) and was named one of “10 Names to Know in the Vape World” in the October 2015 issue of Vape Magazine. Mr. Chowdhury received the 2018 National Law Review Go-To Thought Leadership Award for his consistent coverage of the emerging issues surrounding vaping and e-cigarettes on Keller and Heckman’s law blog, The Continuum of Risk.  As an industry leader, Mr. Chowdhury frequently speaks at industry conferences and events.

Mr. Chowdhury also has an active pro bono practice through Keller and Heckman’s Pro Bono Program, and has been featured in the Baltimore Sun for successfully obtaining asylum in the United States for a family who fled their home country of El Salvador because of violence they faced from an international gang.

Prior to entering private practice, he served as a judicial law clerk on the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Mr. Chowdhury received a B.A. and B.S. from Johns Hopkins University, a MBA from the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business, and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Maryland School of Law.

Education: Johns Hopkins University (B.A., B.S., 2003); University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business (M.B.A., 2006); University of Maryland School of Law (J.D., 2006, cum laude).

Admissions: District of Columbia; Maryland

Read more about Azim ChowdhuryEmailAzim's Linkedin ProfileAzim's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Ian Murray Ian Murray
Read more about Ian MurrayEmailIan's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    The Continuum of Risk
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo