Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NYDFS Examination of Crypto Payment Service Provider Ends in Settlement

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal & Matt Benz on April 10, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Law-of-the-Ledger-Blog-Image-Cryptocurrency-660x283

On March 16, NYDFS entered a consent order resolving an examination of a payment service provider that allows merchants to accept Bitcoin payments from customers in exchange for the equivalent value in local currency credited to the merchant’s bank account. The company is licensed by the NYDFS to engage in virtual currency business activity pursuant to 23 NYCRR Part 200. Licensees under Part 200 are required to, among other things, adhere to federal and state laws mandating effective controls to guard against money laundering and certain other illegal activities.

The NYDFS concluded that the payments service provider, in violation of the Part 200, failed to develop adequate internal policies and controls to maintain compliance with applicable anti-money laundering laws and failed to comply with necessary risk management requirements under applicable OFAC regulations. This follows a previous examination of the payment service provider in 2018, through which the NYDFS found deficiencies in the company’s overall compliance function, including with respect to its anti-money laundering and cybersecurity compliance programs.

Pursuant to the consent order, the payment service provider agreed to pay a $1 million civil monetary penalty and submit an action plan to the NYDFS within 180 days detailing its remediation efforts with respect to the alleged violations.

Putting it into Practice: As the consent order highlights, it is vital for companies whose operations involve virtual currency, including payment service providers, to abide by all applicable regulations. And given the recent volatility in the virtual currency space writ large, being aware of and quickly implementing any and all best practices will best protect companies engaged in virtual currency operations from being the target of similar enforcement proceedings or other negative ramifications. This action should be a warning to companies operating in New York and nationally about the regulatory focus on “repeat offenders” (we discussed this focus in previous blog posts here, here, and here). 

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Matt Benz Matt Benz

Matt Benz is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Matt BenzEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo