Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Don’t Forget Deception: FTC and Biometrics

By Liisa Thomas, Elfin Noce & Michael Sutton on June 13, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Privacy-Added-Security-Blog-Image-660x283

With the ongoing BIPA litigation activity in Illinois surrounding collection of biometrics, it can be easy to forget that other issues might surround this practice. Last month the FTC reminded companies not to forget general privacy and data security concerns. Concerns as most know, it enforces under Section 5 of the FTC Act (which prohibits deception and unfairness).

The FTC recognized that there may be an uptick in companies desire to collect biometrics through machine learning. Or, to use biometric information to understand people’s characteristics. The FTC’s issuance of this policy statement suggests it may bring biometric-related actions in the coming months. Its warnings can thus be a helpful signal of things not to do.

Some recommendations to avoid potential allegations of deception and unfairness include:

  • Not making unsubstantiated or false claims about the efficacy of technologies that use biometrics. For example, selling products to business consumers that do not work, and the result being consumer harm.
  • Avoiding deceptive claims about how the company uses biometrics. This includes both misleading a consumer about what biometric information is collected. It also means not deceiving people about how information might be used.
  • Assessing and addressing foreseeable harms. Potential harms could be where a company knows technology is prone to errors, but fails to take steps to prevent them. Appropriate steps would be to find and put in place “readily available tools” to reduce risks.
  • Not “surreptitiously” collecting biometric information. This also covers “unexpected” collection of that information that exposes someone to harm. Those might include, for example, stalking or reputational harm.
  • Evaluating the third parties that will have access biometric information. Appropriate measures, according to the FTC, include both contractual obligations for vendors to minimize risks to consumers and vendor oversight.
  • Training employees. In particular, those who interact with biometric information or technologies that collect or use it.

Putting It into Practice: The FTC has signaled with this policy statement what activities it deems unfair or deceptive in the biometric space. Companies can keep these in mind, in addition to state law obligations of notice and choice.

 

Photo of Liisa Thomas Liisa Thomas

Liisa Thomas, a partner based in the Chicago and London offices, is Leader of the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group.

Read more about Liisa ThomasEmail
Photo of Elfin Noce Elfin Noce

Elfin Noce is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He also is a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team.

Read more about Elfin NoceEmail
Photo of Michael Sutton Michael Sutton

Michael Sutton is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Dallas office.

Read more about Michael SuttonEmail
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Eye On Privacy
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo