Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FCC Proposes Codifying New TCPA Consent Rules in Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

By Craig A. Gilley & Jay Prapaisilp on June 14, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking intending to strengthen consumers’ ability to revoke consent to receive both robocalls and robotexts, in addition to strengthening callers’/texters’ obligations to honor such requests in a timely manner.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) restricts callers from making robocalls and robotexts unless they have received the prior express consent of the called party, subject to a couple of exemptions. The FCC’s proposed action would broaden a consumer’s ability to revoke consent in “any reasonable way.” For example, simply using words such as “stop,” “revoke,” “end,” or “opt out” in response to a call or text would create a presumption, absent contrary evidence, that the consumer has revoked consent.

Robocallers and robotexters would also be prohibited from using complicated or exclusive means to revoke consent. Additionally, for text messages, if the text does not allow for reply texts, the sender would risk potential liability under the TCPA unless it provides a clear and conspicuous disclosure on each text that two-way texting is not technically possible; the sender must also provide an alternative method to revoke consent.

The FCC recognized that a “reasonable” standard for revoking consent cannot encompass all possible methods, so the agency proposed that senders be allowed to make a showing that the consumer did not utilize a reasonable method to convey a request to revoke consent. For example, if the consumers directed their request to an unmonitored email address, the sender could argue that the consumer lacked a reasonable basis for expecting the sender to receive the request.

Under the current rules, there is no established specific time frame for honoring revocation-of-consent requests. The proposal would require robocallers and robotexters to honor revocation-of-consent requests within 24 hours of receiving such requests.

Last, the FCC seeks to codify prior declaratory rulings related to the TCPA. These include:

  • Establishing that senders may send a confirmation text without violating the TCPA, when the purpose of the text is to inform the recipient that their request has been honored
  • Allowing senders to include a request for clarification in their one-time confirmation texts, provided they cease all further robocalls and robotexts absent an affirmative response from the consumer. Absence of a response would be treated as a revocation of consent
  • Any clarification text may not contain any marketing or advertising content or seek to persuade the recipient to reconsider their opt-out decision

Interested parties may submit comments up to 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and replies 45 days after publication.

For more insights into advertising law, bookmark our All About Advertising Law blog and subscribe to our monthly newsletter.

Craig A. Gilley

Craig Gilley provides a broad range of services for regulated communications entities, as well as information technology, education technology, investment, and private equity companies. Craig’s primary practice involves counseling cable operators, broadband providers, internet service providers, video programmers, satellite providers, and wireless/wireline telecommunications…

Craig Gilley provides a broad range of services for regulated communications entities, as well as information technology, education technology, investment, and private equity companies. Craig’s primary practice involves counseling cable operators, broadband providers, internet service providers, video programmers, satellite providers, and wireless/wireline telecommunications providers on a broad range of legal, regulatory, operational, and transactional issues. He also regularly provides transactional, operational, compliance, and strategic advice to information and educational technology firms. Craig also represents investment and private equity companies, providing transactional and compliance support to ensure that both their acquisitions and ongoing investments fully comply with regulatory requirements.

Read more about Craig A. GilleyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    All About Advertising Law
  • Organization:
    Venable LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo