Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AI and Antitrust: When Does an Algorithm Become an Agreement? Part III

By Jennifer Driscoll & Jennifer Driscoll on June 15, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This blog post is the third in a three-part series exploring the intersection between AI and antitrust. (Read Part I and Part II.)

Part III: Proactive Steps

Despite rapid AI developments and changes in the law, described in Part I and Part II of this series, there are some measures companies can undertake to protect themselves from missteps:

1.         Mandatory Antitrust Training that Addresses the Risks of AI.  Many previously-effective compliance programs have not incorporated the topic of AI or its concomitant risks.  At a minimum, individuals should not reach an agreement with competitors on price-fixing or allocating customers, and implement it using AI or any other technology.  Moreover, AI should not be used to monitor whether co-conspirators are complying with or undermining the illicit agreement.

2.         Companies Should Implement Policies Regarding Personal Devices, Instant Messaging and AI.  Enforcers have a broad toolkit to retrieve emails and texts.  In March 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice Criminal Division (DOJ) updated its Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs to include guidance on the use of personal devices and messaging apps such as WhatsApp and Signal to conduct business.  Companies are now expected to have policies that specifically address employees’ work-related use of personal devices and messaging apps.  In the event of an investigation, DOJ may lessen penalties for companies that have these policies and increase consequences for those that don’t.  The Division will likely formally or informally adopt this policy in the near future.  A forward-thinking company will update its compliance policies to address AI usage. 

3.         Ask Counsel to Stay Informed.  Companies may wish to ask qualified outside counsel to stay informed of developments and bring any significant or relevant news to their immediate attention.  Counsel with CIPP-US or similar credentials are well positioned to follow trends and explain how changes will impact companies’ business

Photo of Jennifer Driscoll Jennifer Driscoll

Jennifer Driscoll focuses her practice on investigations, litigation, arbitration, mergers, and counseling. Jen has extensive experience in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, electronic components and automotive industries, with a particular knowledge of industries in Japan and Taiwan. An experienced commercial litigator, Jen defends corporations…

Jennifer Driscoll focuses her practice on investigations, litigation, arbitration, mergers, and counseling. Jen has extensive experience in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, electronic components and automotive industries, with a particular knowledge of industries in Japan and Taiwan. An experienced commercial litigator, Jen defends corporations and individuals against alleged antitrust and anti-corruption claims, both civil and criminal. Her recent cases, which include cartel matters, safety audits and agency inquiries, reflect her skills with government investigations and compliance issues. Jen has represented clients in international cartel investigations, merger investigations, and Sherman Act Section Two class action lawsuits in federal courts. Read her full rc.com bio here.

Read more about Jennifer DriscollEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jennifer Driscoll Jennifer Driscoll

Jennifer Driscoll focuses her practice on investigations, litigation, arbitration, mergers, and counseling. Jen has extensive experience in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, electronic components and automotive industries, with a particular knowledge of industries in Japan and Taiwan. She is a member of the firm’s…

Jennifer Driscoll focuses her practice on investigations, litigation, arbitration, mergers, and counseling. Jen has extensive experience in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, electronic components and automotive industries, with a particular knowledge of industries in Japan and Taiwan. She is a member of the firm’s Business Litigation Group.

An experienced commercial litigator, Jen defends corporations and individuals against alleged antitrust and anti-corruption claims, both civil and criminal. Her recent cases, which include cartel matters, safety audits and agency inquiries, reflect her skills with government investigations and compliance issues. Jen has represented clients in international cartel investigations, merger investigations, and Sherman Act Section Two class action lawsuits in federal courts. She has also counseled international clients about antitrust laws relating to mergers and acquisitions, represented both corporations and individuals in the Antitrust Division’s investigation of the auto parts industry, and defended clients in federal and multi-state investigations involving the False Claims Act and consumer product issues. Jen has been a member of panels discussing antitrust issues, international cartels and unilateral conduct, both in the U.S. and abroad, and has written articles and papers on these topics. View her bio on rc.com

Read more about Jennifer DriscollEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade, Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo