Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Highlights from the Department’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Concerning Athletic Eligibility

By John W. Borkowski, Aleks Ostojic Rushing & Mackenzie Conway on July 28, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Choosing your way

On April 6, 2023, the U.S. Department of Education released a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which was published in the Federal Register on April 13, 2023, on athletic eligibility under Title IX. The express aim of the proposed rule is to advance Title IX’s goal of ensuring equal opportunity in athletics. While working with stakeholders to develop the proposed rule, the department learned that there is uncertainty about when and how students who identify as transgender can participate in school-sponsored sports, and the proposed rule seeks to provide clarity for students, parents, and schools. The department provided a fact sheet highlighting key aspects of the proposed rule, which are summarized below.

  • The proposed rule would apply to K-12 school districts, as well as higher education institutions receiving federal funding.
  • The proposed rule affirms school districts can offer separate men’s and boys’ and women’s and girls’ sports teams in certain circumstances. For example, a school district could offer a golf team for girls, but not boys, and exclude a boy from the girls’ golf team, as long as it provides boys with equal opportunity based on sex in its athletics program as a whole.
  • The proposed rule would prohibit school districts from adopting a “one-size-fits-all” policy banning students that identify as transgender from participating on teams consistent with the student’s gender identity. It would allow school districts flexibility to develop team eligibility criteria that serve important educational objectives.
  • The department expects elementary school students would generally be able to participate on school sports teams consistent with their gender identity. For students at the high school and collegiate level, the department expects sex-related criteria that limit participation of some students that identify as transgender may be permitted when they enable the school district to achieve an important educational objective, such as ensuring fairness in competition or preventing sports-related injury.
  • School districts would be required to consider certain considerations when developing a policy for participation, including:
    • Differences among students and school sports teams depending on grade and education level;
    • Variances in the level of competition, such as ranging from very competitive to intramural or junior varsity teams; and
    • The nature of the sports to which restrictions would apply.
  • The proposed rule recognizes the importance of minimizing harm to students whose participation on teams consistent with their gender identity would be limited or denied.

The proposed rule had a public comment period for 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register, which expired on May 15, 2023, and received over 150,000 comments.

What this means to you

While school districts are not required to make any policy changes based on the proposed rule, once the department releases a final rule, they will need to adopt their athletic participation policies accordingly.

Photo of John W. Borkowski John W. Borkowski

Coming from a family of teachers, John knows that educators are dedicated to serving students and society. His lifelong passion for education underlies the insightful counsel he provides to colleges, universities and school districts.

Read more about John W. BorkowskiEmailJohn's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Aleks Ostojic Rushing Aleks Ostojic Rushing

As a licensed teacher, Aleks’ passion for education runs deep and is at the core of her work with clients. She knows that every client and every student requires a unique approach to optimize success. Aleks counsels K-12 and higher education clients on…

As a licensed teacher, Aleks’ passion for education runs deep and is at the core of her work with clients. She knows that every client and every student requires a unique approach to optimize success. Aleks counsels K-12 and higher education clients on investigations, litigation and compliance matters arising from a wide range of civil rights and educational funding issues. These include Title IX, Title IV, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Family Educational Records Privacy Act (FERPA).

Read more about Aleks Ostojic RushingEmailAleks Ostojic's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Mackenzie Conway Mackenzie Conway

Mackenzie guides clients on proactive compliance, training and policies that meet and exceed a wide range of changing regulations and place both public and private schools on optimal standing to face unexpected challenges. When audits or claims arise, Mackenzie collaborates within the firm’s…

Mackenzie guides clients on proactive compliance, training and policies that meet and exceed a wide range of changing regulations and place both public and private schools on optimal standing to face unexpected challenges. When audits or claims arise, Mackenzie collaborates within the firm’s coast-to-coast footprint for optimal representation and resolution.

Read more about Mackenzie ConwayEmailMackenzie's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    K-12 Legal Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo