Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Game On! Microsoft and Activision Deal is One Step Closer to Actual Reality

By Eugenio Duron-Carielo on September 28, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 18, 2022, Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision, one of the world’s most-valuable gaming companies, was announced. In April 2023, the United Kingdom’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) blocked the deal on concerns that the deal could “alter the future of the fast-growing cloud gaming market, leading to reduced innovation and less choice for UK gamers over the years,” a decision that Microsoft appealed to a Competition Appeal Tribunal. A few months later, in July 2023, as previously reported in Minding Your Business, the FTC’s challenge to the deal in the United States fell short, leaving the UK as the only competition authority preventing the closing of the deal.

To address the CMA’s original concern regarding the cloud gaming market, Microsoft submitted a revised proposal in August for the CMA to review. Under its August proposal, Microsoft would no longer purchase the cloud gaming rights held by Activision. Instead, these rights would be sold to Ubisoft, an independent video game publisher, before the acquisition of Activision was finalized.

On September 22, 2023, the CMA issued a press release in which it accepted that the “sale of Activision’s cloud gaming rights to Ubisoft substantially addresses previous concerns and opens the door to the deal being cleared.” Under this new deal, the CMA stated, “Ubisoft will be free to offer Activision’s games both directly to consumers and to all cloud gaming service providers however it chooses…”.

The CMA also appeared to be satisfied with the proposed deal. Although the CMA identified “limited residual concerns with the new deal” in its full text decision, such as “the possibility for certain provisions within the Ubisoft Divestment Agreement to be circumvented, terminated, or not enforced” giving Microsoft the opportunity to “foreclose rival cloud gaming providers,” it noted in its press release that Microsoft “has put forward remedies which the CMA has provisionally concluded should address these issues.”

Although the CMA opened a consultation period on these proposed remedies until October 6, its provisional acceptance of the deal should clear the path, once again, for the Microsoft-Activision deal to close by the October 18 deadline.

 

Photo of Eugenio Duron-Carielo Eugenio Duron-Carielo

Eugenio Duron-Carielo is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Commercial Litigation and Mass Torts & Product Liability and Trials Groups.

He earned his J.D. and M.B.A. degrees from New York University, where he was a Fellow at the…

Eugenio Duron-Carielo is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Commercial Litigation and Mass Torts & Product Liability and Trials Groups.

He earned his J.D. and M.B.A. degrees from New York University, where he was a Fellow at the Glucksman Institute for Research in Securities Markets, a staff editor for the NYU Tax Law Review, and President of NYU Law’s Dean’s Cup. While at NYU, he worked at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Division of Enforcement in New York City. Prior to law school, Eugenio graduated from The University of Texas with a B.B.A. in finance.

Read more about Eugenio Duron-CarieloEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Minding Your Business
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo