Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Court of Appeal Gives Judgment on Effect of Russia Sanctions on Pending Litigation

By Polina Lyadnova, Andreas Wildner, Yulia A. Solomakhina & dmulloy on October 23, 2023
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In June 2019, PJSC National Bank Trust (the “First Claimant”) and PJSC Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation (the “Second Claimant”) commenced litigation in the English High Court, claiming substantial damages on basis of alleged conspiracies resulting in uncommercial transactions whereby loans were replaced with worthless or near worthless bonds.

Following the designation of the Second Claimant for purposes of the UK’s Russia-related sanctions regime, the Defendants applied to the court for a stay of proceedings. On 27 January 2023, that application was dismissed in the High Court.

The First to Fourth Defendants brought an appeal against the High Court’s decision which, on October 6, 2023, the Court of Appeal (the “Court”) dismissed.

This memorandum explores the reasoning of the Court’s judgment and its wider implications.

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Cleary Foreign Investment and International Trade Watch
  • Organization:
    Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo