Lesson. A money judgment that includes an award of attorney’s fees accrues statutory post-judgment interest.

Case cite. Piccadilly Mgmt. v. Abney, 215 N.E.3d 1078 (Ind. Ct. App. 2023)

Legal issue. Whether an award of attorney’s fees is separate from a judgment and thus excluded from the calculation of post-judgment interest.

Vital facts. This case was an eviction matter in which the Plaintiff landlord received a judgment against the Defendant tenant for unpaid rent plus attorney’s fees. During post-judgment garnishment proceedings, Plaintiff sought recovery of statutory post-judgment interest on both the unpaid rent and the attorney’s fees components of the judgment.

Procedural history. The trial court denied Plaintiff’s request for post-judgment interest on the award of attorney’s fees. Plaintiff appealed.

Key rules. In Indiana, “post-judgment interest is a creature of statute, borne of legislative authority,” and is not subject to being denied by the discretion of a judge.

The relevant statute is Indiana Code Section 24-4.6-1-101, which states:

Except as otherwise provided by statute, interest on judgments for money whenever rendered shall be from the date of the return of the verdict or finding of the court until satisfaction at an annual rate of eight percent (8%) if there was no contract by the parties.

The “shall” in the statute means that prevailing plaintiffs are “automatically entitled” to post-judgment interest.

Further, established Indiana precedent provides that “awards of … attorney’s fees … accrue post-judgment interest under the statute.”

Holding. The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the trial court.

Policy/rationale. Piccadilly arose out of a small claims court proceeding, and the court interpreted a specific small claims statute as prohibiting interest from running on an award of fees. The Court of Appeals saw things differently. For purposes of this blog, lenders should be aware that, when obtaining foreclosure-related judgments, counsel’s fees are to be considered an element of the underlying judgment – not unlike unpaid principal or other damages items – that will accrue statutory post-judgment interest.

Related posts.

__________
Part of my practice involves representing parties in loan enforcement actions. If you need assistance with a similar matter, please call me at 317-639-6151 or email me at john.waller@dinsmore.com. Also, don’t forget that you can follow me on Twitter @JohnDWaller or on LinkedIn, or you can subscribe to posts via RSS or email as noted on my home page.

Photo of John D. Waller John D. Waller

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of…

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of underperforming loans; filing and defending lawsuits to enforce promissory notes, guaranties, and other written contracts; foreclosing mortgages and enforcing personal property security interests; applying for court-ordered receiverships; protecting lien rights in bankruptcy court; purchasing or selling distressed loans; and representing court-appointed receivers.

His practice also includes representing mortgage loan servicers and the corresponding trusts/investors in consumer finance litigation, including contested residential foreclosures, title insurance claims, regulatory violation cases, tax sale disputes, and compliance matters. John also asserts the rights of parties in complex, real estate-related and title litigation and represents companies and individuals in contract disputes.

An AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated lawyer and partner in the Indianapolis office of the national law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, John graduated from DePauw University in 1990 and immediately entered the Indiana University School of Law. In 1993, he received his license to practice in Indiana’s state and federal courts. John later completed an intensive week-long professional training program in trial skills presented by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. John has represented companies and individuals in a wide variety of disputes. He has tried a number of bench and jury trials, and has handled several appeals. He and his wife have three sons.