Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC Announces Settlement of Junk Fee Enforcement Action

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Matt Benz on February 9, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Finance-and-Bankruptcy-Blog-Image_Sinking-Piggy-Bank-660x283

On February 6, the FTC announced that it had reached proposed settlements with several defendants in a pending action where the parties were accused of operating a fraudulent student debt relief scheme and collecting so-called “junk fees” from consumers.

In its initial complaint, filed in August 2023, the FTC alleged that the defendants falsely claimed to be affiliated with the U.S. Department of Education and used names which consumers have understood to refer to the Biden-Harris Administration’s Student Loan Debt Relief Plan for the purpose of luring students into signing up for a non-existent student debt relief program. The defendants allegedly collected approximately $8.8 million in fees in exchange for the phantom program. According to the FTC, the defendants also used these misrepresentations to illegally obtain consumers’ bank account and credit card information.

Pursuant to the consent order, the defendants are, among other things, permanently banned from the debt relief industry, and required to pay a $7.4 million civil money penalty. 

Putting it into Practice: This FTC enforcement action highlights the harsh penalties that companies providing debt relief services, especially student debt relief services, can face for making misrepresentations to consumers. In addition, this enforcement action underscores the recent regulatory crackdown on companies providing fraudulent debt relief services and charging so-called junk fees to consumers (see previous blog posts here, here, and here). Accordingly, financial services companies offering products relating to debt relief and credit repair should review these recent enforcement actions and be keenly aware of the heightened agency scrutiny of these product offerings.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Matt Benz Matt Benz

Matt Benz is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Matt BenzEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo