Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Office of Open Records Makes Final Determination Requiring Disclosure

By Francis Pileggi on February 25, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In the matter of Fein v. Chester County, OOR Docket No.: AP 2023-2043 (Sept. 26, 2023), the Office of Open Records (“OOR”) considered an appeal from the denial by Chester County of a request to provide unredacted copies of absentee-ballot information and mail-in ballots, files, applications for ballots and envelopes available, consistent with the access provisions of the Election Code. The eight page decision of the OOR explains why the redactions were not justified by either the Election Code or the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law. See 65 P.S. §§ 67.101, et seq.

The County appealed the OOR decision, but there was an issue about whether they appealed within the deadline of “30-days of the mailing date.”  On Feb. 15, 2024, there was a hearing in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas on the issue of whether or not the appeal by the County was timely, and the court asked the parties to submit written legal arguments. (A judge from another county was tasked with hearing the case.)

Photo of Francis Pileggi Francis Pileggi
Read more about Francis PileggiEmail
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    PA Right to Know Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Francis G.X. Pileggi
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo