Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FDIC Issues Consent Order Against Tennessee Bank

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Beineng Zhang on March 1, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FinTech-Blog-Banking-1-660x283

On January 30, a Tennessee-based community bank entered into a consent order with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. following the agency’s allegations that the Bank engaged in unsafe or unsound banking practices relating to its third-party risk management practices with its fintech partners. While the order does not list the FDIC’s concerns with the bank’s third-party partnerships, the order requires it to come up with a plan within 60 days to end its relationship with its “significant third-party fintech partners.” In addition, the bank must implement a program to evaluate and manage the risks associated with the fintechs it directly works with, and fintechs with whom its direct partners work. 

The consent order mandates a comprehensive set of actions and corrective measures aimed at addressing various aspects of the Bank’s operations, management, and regulatory compliance. Some of the key actions demanded include:

  • Enhanced Internal Audit Functions. Develop and implement a plan to bolster audit functions, focusing on high-risk areas (“on boarding deposits obtained through third parties, processing payments obtained through third parties, and sweeping deposits”) with independent audit reporting.
  • Restricted Growth. The bank needs the FDIC’s approval for any growth by more than 10% during any calendar quarter period in total assets or liabilities, or for expanding or adding business lines that would result in annual 10% growth in total assets or liabilities.
  • Manage Third-Party FinTech Risks.
    • Conduct Risk Assessments and Formalize the Onboard Process. Evaluate risks from direct and indirect fintech partners, ensuring due diligence, compliance oversight, and effective internal controls, and mandate external assessments of the bank’s fintech relationships. Moreover, the bank should establish a process for vetting new fintech partners. 
    • Develop Contingency Plans. Create strategies for terminating significant fintech partnerships, ensuring orderly processes.

Putting It Into Practice: The consent order highlights once again (we blogged about a similar consent order here) the intensified scrutiny by federal regulators on fintech partnerships, emphasizing the need for banks to comply with interagency guidance on third-party relationships. Notably, this reflects a broader regulatory focus on ensuring that banks effectively manage third-party risks, especially within fintech collaborations. Banks are advised to reevaluate their fintech partnerships, assess their current risk management programs against the final guidance, identify necessary enhancements, and develop plans to enhance control effectiveness, thereby aligning with regulatory expectations and strengthening compliance frameworks.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Beineng Zhang Beineng Zhang

Beineng Zhang is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Beineng ZhangEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo