Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CFPB Renews Push on “Junk Fees” with Closing Costs in its Sights

By Moorari Shah, A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Moriah Dworkin on March 15, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
One dollar bill by the wall
Kenny Eliason, Unsplash

In its latest campaign against “junk fees,” the CFPB announced that it was requesting consumer feedback on fees incurred as part of the residential home loan closing process, such as title insurance, credit reporting, and origination fees, as well as appraisal costs. 

In a March 8 blog post, the CFPB noted a substantial rise in closing costs for borrowers, citing a 21.8% increase in median total loan costs from 2021 to 2022. The Bureau noted that many of these costs are fixed and do not change based on the interest rate or size of the loan, resulting in an outsized impact on lower income borrowers and first-time homebuyers. The Bureau noted it was paying particular attention to the recent rise in discount points as a higher percentage of borrowers reported paying them in 2022 than any other years since this data point was first reported in 2018. This is likely in large part due to the current high interest rate environment, a fact that was curiously absent from the Bureau’s post.

The CFPB attributed the rise in closing costs to a lack of competition among providers. It noted that it was working to analyze mortgage closing costs, seek public input and, if necessary, “issue rules and guidance to improve competition, choice, and affordability.”

Putting It Into Practice: The Bureau’s assault on fees continues (previously discussed here and here). Notably, the residential mortgage market is highly regulated. In fact, in 2015 the industry implemented the CFPB’s TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures (TRID) Rule, which significantly reformed and consolidated mortgage disclosures provided to borrowers. Notwithstanding this recent regulation, the CFPB appears to want a second bite at the apple, and is expected to target disclosures and closing fees with additional regulatory guidance and possible rulemaking.

Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Moriah Dworkin Moriah Dworkin

Moriah Dworkin is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Century City office. She is an associate co-lead of the Technology Transactions Team and the Artificial Intelligence Team.

Read more about Moriah DworkinEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo