Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Washington State Passes New “True Lender” Legislation

By A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Brandon Mohamad* on April 12, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Finance-and-Fintech-Blog-Image-Regulatory-660x283

On March 25, Washington State became the latest in a growing list of jurisdictions to introduce a “true lender” law with the passing of bill SB 6025. The legislation, similar to laws in other states would characterize a person as the “lender” of a loan if the person makes a loan in excess of the state’s rate cap and if the person:

  • holds the predominant economic interest in a loan originated through a bank partnership; or
  • the totality of the circumstances indicate that the person is the lender.

The legislation codifies the true lender test into law, and make bank partnerships that lend to consumers in Washington subject to licensing and compliance obligations.

Moreover, the statute has an anti-evasion provision that prevents entities from engaging in acts that evade the requirements of the law by, among other things:

  • offering loans under the guise of personal property sale or leaseback deals;
  • disguising loan proceeds as a cash rebate for the pretextual installment sale of goods or services; or,
  • making, offering, assisting, or arranging a debtor to obtain a loan with a rate of interest in excess of the state’s rate cap. 
  • Loans made in violation of the statute’s requirements would be considered null, void, and uncollectable.

Putting it into Practice: True lender laws continue to show no sign of slowing down, as various states have recently proposed similar legislation. Moreover, the broad reach of Washington’s law impacts not only lenders and their fintech partners, but also entities that assist in connecting consumers to lenders, such as lead generators. Under the law, any entity that “assists” a consumer in obtaining a loan could be subject to licensure obligations and possible penalties if they are found violating the law. Companies engaged in bank partnership arrangements should continue to pay close attention to any related legislative developments in the jurisdictions in which they operate.

Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Brandon Mohamad* Brandon Mohamad*

Brandon Mohamad is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo