Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The 3 E’s for Proactive Compliance Against AI-Washing

By Gonzalo Go & Anna T. Pinedo on April 16, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 15, 2024, Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement Director Gurbir Grewal delivered remarks during a Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement Spring Conference 2024.  He addressed artificial intelligence (“AI”) and the concept of “AI-washing,” wherein public companies make overly positive, misleading or false claims in an effort to benefit from investor interest in AI-related technologies.

Inasmuch as registered investment advisers were the ones penalized by the SEC for AI-washing last month (see our insights here), Director Grewal reminded the investment industry (and particularly public companies) not to rush to make “claims about using AI in [their] investment processes to capitalize on growing investor interest,” but instead to evaluate if these representations are accurate or merely aspirational.  Representations regarding AI usage should not be materially false or misleading.  To prevent AI-washing and manage risks, he introduced the concept of “proactive compliance,” which requires:

  1. Education.  Staying informed about emerging and heightened AI risks to one’s business and industry by reading AI-related enforcement actions and reviewing future actions. (See our earlier blogpost on Artificial Intelligence, the Movies and Hallucinations, here).  
  2. Engagement.  Collaborating with personnel across different business units to understand how AI intersects with their activities, strategies and financial incentives.  Evaluate each AI-related public statement about the company and related risks (e.g., security risks, competitive risks, etc.) to assess their accuracy.
  3. Execution.  Updating policies, procedures and internal controls to address AI risks, and avoid relying solely on generic tools (e.g., ChatGPT) to create AI policies.  Effective execution is necessary for successful adoption.

The full text of Director Grewal’s remarks is available here.

Photo of Anna T. Pinedo Anna T. Pinedo

Anna Pinedo is a partner in Mayer Brown’s New York office and a member of the Corporate & Securities practice. She concentrates her practice on securities and derivatives. Anna represents issuers, investment banks/financial intermediaries and investors in financing transactions, including public offerings and…

Anna Pinedo is a partner in Mayer Brown’s New York office and a member of the Corporate & Securities practice. She concentrates her practice on securities and derivatives. Anna represents issuers, investment banks/financial intermediaries and investors in financing transactions, including public offerings and private placements of equity and debt securities, as well as structured notes and other hybrid and structured products.

Read Anna’s full bio.

Read more about Anna T. PinedoEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate Governance and Compliance, Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Free Writings + Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo