Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Customs to Allow Administrative Protective Orders in EAPA Investigations

By Jamie Shookman on April 22, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Effective April 17, 2024, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) has amended its regulations implementing the Enforce and Protect Act of 2015 (“EAPA”), a statute granting increased authority to investigate allegations of evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty (“AD/CVD”) orders. The amendments were issued in a final rule of March 18, 2024, and they are the first since CBP issued interim regulations following EAPA’s enactment.

One of the most anticipated amendments is that CBP will now issue administrative protective orders (“APOs”) granting parties access to business confidential information in EAPA investigations. The change follows the Federal Circuit’s decision in the Royal Brush case last summer. As described in a prior post, that decision held that CBP has inherent authority to use APOs even though EAPA does not explicitly provide for them, and that CBP violates importers’ due process rights when it denies access to confidential information used against them in EAPA determinations. The final rule states that additional guidance on the new APO process is forthcoming, and that CBP may initiate separate rulemaking to further codify the process.

Other amendments include formalizing the EAPA Portal through which allegations are made, streamlining investigation procedures, including maintenance and access to the administrative record through the EAPA Portal, and revising EAPA’s verification process. CBP’s final rule also provides numerous clarifications, including with respect to the process by which it makes referrals to the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to determine whether merchandise described in an EAPA allegation is within the scope of an AD/CVD order, as well as the interaction between EAPA investigations and CBP’s penalty provisions. 

Husch Blackwell will continue to monitor developments relating to the EAPA amendments, including the implementation of the new APO rules. In the meantime, for guidance or questions relating to U.S. customs and trade laws, companies can contact Husch Blackwell’s International Trade and Supply Chain team.

Photo of Jamie Shookman Jamie Shookman

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings

…

Jamie’s experience representing federal government agencies in trade and customs matters helps clients navigate U.S. trade laws as they grow their businesses. Jamie’s practice draws on her extensive experience handling cases in the U.S. Court of International Trade and learning the inner workings of the federal agencies involved. She primarily represents domestic manufacturers, advising on complex regulatory regimes, proactively assessing new trade programs, and handling litigation as it arises.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo