Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Impact of Chevron Reversal on Government Contractors

By Brian Iverson on July 18, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a recent Law360 article, I provided insight on the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overruled the long-standing deference afforded to administrative agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Although the Loper decision does not directly address government contracts, I noted that it will almost certainly be read to resolve a circuit split under which some circuits have deferred to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous terms in their own contracts.

The government contract circuit split came before the Supreme Court in petition for writ of certiorari in 2017 in Scenic America, Inc. v. Dep’t of Transportation.  At that time, I wrote about Justice Gorsuch’s somewhat unusual step of providing a written statement on the case. I noted that Justice Gorsuch was openly critical of Chevron deference, and his written statement strongly suggested that deference had no place in contract interpretation questions. Still, Justice Gorsuch (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito) agreed with the denial of certiorari because thorny procedural issues would complicate the Court’s analysis of the Chevron deference questions.

Now that the Court’s Loper Bright decision has overruled Chevron, I predicted that Justice Gorsuch’s written statement in Scenic America will support the conclusion that courts should not defer to agency interpretations of their own contracts. I noted that the last paragraph of Justice Gorsuch’s statement “essentially says that ‘this is an issue we should take up.’” “I don’t think [Justice Gorsuch] was shy about making that invitation,” I explained. In other words, courts are likely to view Loper Bright as requiring them to apply the same contract interpretation principles to government contracts as are commonly applied to ambiguous commercial contracts including, for example, contra proferentem (or construction against the drafter).

The full article, “Chevron Reversal May Shift Contract Dispute Outcomes,” was published by Law360 on July 3 and is available online.

Photo of Brian Iverson Brian Iverson

Brian Iverson has led clients to victory in a wide range of high-stakes litigation across the nation. His practice primarily focuses on complex business disputes, including intellectual property, government contract and financial services litigation. Brian’s broad experience allows him to quickly understand clients’…

Brian Iverson has led clients to victory in a wide range of high-stakes litigation across the nation. His practice primarily focuses on complex business disputes, including intellectual property, government contract and financial services litigation. Brian’s broad experience allows him to quickly understand clients’ business objectives and offer creative, practical and cost-effective strategies to achieve their goals.

Read more about Brian IversonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    GovCon & Trade
  • Organization:
    Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo