Lesson. As a general rule, a plaintiff cannot inquire about a defendant’s assets or seek a security bond until a judgment has been entered.

Case cite. Busbin v. Excavator’s Transp. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 202598 (S.D. Ind. 2023)

Legal issue. Whether a plaintiff can attach a defendant’s property to secure a yet-to-be-entered judgment by filing a simple motion.

Vital facts. The underlying case arose out of Plaintiff’s employment-related claims against his employers.

Procedural history. Plaintiff moved to set a security bond and/or attach certain property of Defendants to secure a future judgment. More specifically, Plaintiff asked “the Court to order Defendant … to appear at a hearing and bring information regarding [Defendant’s] bank accounts, real and tangible property, and people or entities that owe Defendants money.”

Key rules. Plaintiff cited to Indiana Trial Rule 64 “Seizure of person or property” in support of the motion.

Defendant pointed to Indiana Code §§ 34-25-2-1 and 4 related to “prejudgment attachment.” Section 4 “requires that a plaintiff seeking remedies such as those sought by Plaintiff make an affidavit showing: (1) the nature of the claim; (2) that the claim is just; (3) the amount to be recovered; and (4) that one of the grounds for an attachment enumerated in Indiana Code § 34-25-2-1 is present.”

I wrote about Section 1 in my 11/20/23 post The Challenges Of Obtaining Prejudgment Attachment.

Holding. The Court denied Plaintiff’s motion.

Policy/rationale. Plaintiff failed to meet the high burden of establishing the right to pre-judgment attachment. The Court reasoned:

[The applicable law]—in addition to common sense—support the conclusion that Plaintiff cannot simply file a motion, cite to Indiana Trial Rule 64, and insist that Defendants be ordered into court with bank and other records, secure a bond, and/or have property attached based solely upon the fact that Plaintiff has filed suit against Defendants. Plaintiff needs to make a more significant showing to justify the relief sought, and Plaintiff has fallen far short of doing so.

Related posts. My blog’s category Attachment/Garnishment has several posts dealing with these issues.
__________
I represent parties involved in commercial collection actions. If you need assistance with a similar matter, please call me at 317-639-6151 or email me at john.waller@dinsmore.com. Also, don’t forget that you can follow me on Twitter @JohnDWaller or on LinkedIn, or you can subscribe to posts via RSS or email as noted on my home page.

Photo of John D. Waller John D. Waller

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of…

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of underperforming loans; filing and defending lawsuits to enforce promissory notes, guaranties, and other written contracts; foreclosing mortgages and enforcing personal property security interests; applying for court-ordered receiverships; protecting lien rights in bankruptcy court; purchasing or selling distressed loans; and representing court-appointed receivers.

His practice also includes representing mortgage loan servicers and the corresponding trusts/investors in consumer finance litigation, including contested residential foreclosures, title insurance claims, regulatory violation cases, tax sale disputes, and compliance matters. John also asserts the rights of parties in complex, real estate-related and title litigation and represents companies and individuals in contract disputes.

An AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated lawyer and partner in the Indianapolis office of the national law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, John graduated from DePauw University in 1990 and immediately entered the Indiana University School of Law. In 1993, he received his license to practice in Indiana’s state and federal courts. John later completed an intensive week-long professional training program in trial skills presented by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. John has represented companies and individuals in a wide variety of disputes. He has tried a number of bench and jury trials, and has handled several appeals. He and his wife have three sons.