Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Unsuccessful work attempt

By Gordon Gates on August 19, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

If you have worked at the SGA level at any time since the alleged onset date of your Social Security disability claim, it can be problematic for your claim. You must have (or expect to have) a 12-month period of disability to qualify for Social Security disability (or have a condition which is expected to result in death). That means means 12 months or longer with no work at the SGA level.

However, if your work after onset lasted for six months or less and ended due to your impairments, then it may qualify as an unsuccessful work attempt, and not be held against you. The criteria for an unsuccessful work attempt (UWA) are found in 20 C.F.R. 404.1574(c). For reference, see also Social Security Ruling  84-25.

An example might help. Consider a case with an alleged onset date of 11/20/2022. However, from 6/01/2023 – 9/30/2023 this claimant returned to work, and earned wages above the level of SGA for 4 months. But the work became too much due to the claimant’s symptoms, and they had to stop. They subsequently filed a claim for Social Security disability benefits.

So there it is: 4 months of work above the level of SGA, smack in the middle of the 12-month disability period. As a result, there is not a 12 month period of disability, as required. If there were not an exception for an unsuccessful work attempt, the claim would either have to be denied at Step 1 of the sequential evaluation process, or a new onset date of 10/01/2023 (after the 4 months of SGA work) would be needed.

However, with the UWA, the 4 months of work is excused. The disability period runs from the original onset date of 11/20/2022. This results in an additional ten months of retroactive benefits for the claimant. 

Photo of Gordon Gates Gordon Gates

Gordon Gates specializes in Social Security disability law, and he handles claims at every level of the Social Security disability claim process. He assists clients with initial applications for disability benefits, with appeals of denied claims, and with hearings by an administrative law…

Gordon Gates specializes in Social Security disability law, and he handles claims at every level of the Social Security disability claim process. He assists clients with initial applications for disability benefits, with appeals of denied claims, and with hearings by an administrative law judge.

Gordon has successfully appealed unfavorable administrative law judge decisions the Social Security Appeals Council and to U.S. District Court (District of Maine) to have those claims remanded for new hearings.

Gordon attended Maine Maritime Academy and Tulane University Law School. At Tulane, he served as Senior Articles Editor of the Tulane Law Review and graduated magna cum laude. He was admitted to practice law in Maine in 1991. Since 2005, he has concentrated his law practice on Social Security disability and SSI cases.

Gordon is the publisher of Social Security Disability Lawyer, a nationally-read legal blog. He presented at the Fall 2010 conference of National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR) on the topic of Writing Hearing Briefs for the ALJ.

Read more about Gordon GatesEmailGordon's Linkedin ProfileGordon's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Social Security Disability Lawyer Blog
  • Organization:
    Law Offices of Gordon Gates
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo