Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC Issues Final Rule on Fake Reviews and Testimonials

By Clayton Friedman & Blake Christopher on August 27, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a final rule to combat fake reviews and testimonials.[1]

For years, false testimonials have infiltrated social media sites and other websites. Consider the 2017 NCAA men’s basketball tournament, during which University of Kentucky fans left false reviews for “Rooferees,” a Nebraska roofing company.[2] Why did basketball fans in Kentucky submit fake reviews for a roofing company in Nebraska? Because a college basketball referee owned “Rooferees,” and Kentucky fans were unhappy with the way he refereed their game against the University of North Carolina.

But Kentucky fans moonlighting as amateur critics are not quite the conduct the FTC is targeting with its new rule. Rather, the focus is on businesses that create (or even buy) false testimonials for themselves, solicit negative reviews of competitors, suppress bad reviews, or intimidate consumers to remove negative reviews.

Fake reviews can poison fair and honest marketplaces. Even one false review can make it difficult for consumers to distinguish legitimate reviews from illegitimate ones, and good businesses from bad. As FTC Chair Lina M. Khan recently said, “[f]ake reviews waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors.”[3] So the FTC voted 5 to 0 to implement its new rule.

The FTC’s final rule generally prohibits the following:

  • Fake or false consumer reviews, consumer testimonials, and celebrity testimonials;
  • Buying positive or negative reviews;
  • Insider reviews and consumer testimonials;
  • Misrepresenting the nature of company-controlled review websites;
  • Review suppression; and
  • Misuse of fake social media indicators.[4]

The rule has sharp teeth: it permits the FTC to seek civil penalties against knowing violators.[5] Currently, the FTC can recover more than $50,000 per violation. The rule becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Why It Matters

The FTC passed the rule to crack down on false reviews that can frustrate fair and honest competition. In the months to come, companies will need to reassess the way they advertise and market themselves—and the way they police their reviews. They should put policies and procedures in place to govern both employees and affiliated third parties like social media influencers and individuals operating under endorsement deals. We will be monitoring these industry changes as they develop.


[1] See https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/federal-trade-commission-announces-final-rule-banning-fake-reviews-testimonials.

[2] https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ftw/2017/03/28/kentucky-fans-cross-the-line-by-trashing-referee-john-higgins-business-on-facebook/99747670/.

[3] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/federal-trade-commission-announces-final-rule-banning-fake-reviews-testimonials.

[4] Id.

[5] Id.

Photo of Clayton Friedman Clayton Friedman

Clayton is a partner in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group and co-leader of the State Attorneys General practice, multidisciplinary teams with decades of experience crafting effective strategies to help deter or mitigate the risk of enforcement actions and…

Clayton is a partner in the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group and co-leader of the State Attorneys General practice, multidisciplinary teams with decades of experience crafting effective strategies to help deter or mitigate the risk of enforcement actions and litigation.

Read more about Clayton FriedmanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Blake Christopher Blake Christopher

Blake collaborates with clients on matters related to government contracting, investigations, and disputes. His senior-level government experience generates valuable insights and strategies for clients across a variety of industries.

Read more about Blake ChristopherEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo